OEIAC 💭
@OEIAC_UdG
L'OEIAC promou els usos ètics i legals de la intel·ligència artificial a través del Model PIO (disponible en català, castellà, anglès i francès)
📢 El nou #ModelPIO ja està disponible! 🗨️ Una nova eina d’avaluació que promou el compliment de la normativa d'IA i de drets i s'alinea amb l'adopció de principis ètics i d’estàndards d’alt nivell. També conté catàlegs, recomanacions i molta informació! oeiac.cat
Enèsima vegada que un estudi demana precaució a partir d'una associació significativa persistent i enèsima vegada que els pedagogs digitals sense formació estadística repeteixen de forma estocàstica i conspiranoica que llur associació no implica causalitat tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
The algorithms don’t protect them; they actively push content that provokes stronger reactions, whether that’s anger, shame, or fascination with material far beyond their developmental readiness. For a developing mind, this can mean distorted self‑image, heightened anxiety,…
📢 El V Cicle de seminaris OEIAC continua el mes de setembre amb la conferència "La mediació tecnològica de la IA en l’atenció a persones: crear capacitats o des-capacitar?", a càrrec de la Dra. Begoña Román @gr_aporia 🗓️ 17 de setembre a les 18h 💻 Online (canal YouTube UdG)
“Just because people perceive an AI technology as more capable than humans does not mean they will adopt it. They also care about personalization. If either one of these conditions is not satisfied, then people exhibit an aversion to AI.” bit.ly/44YMcwe
The use of #AI tools in health care raises questions about patient informed consent, necessitating a framework to decide when disclosure is needed. Learn more in this Perspective. 🔗 ja.ma/4116uE5
Tot i així veiem com des dels sectors que són religiosament promòbil es demana prudència a la inversa (seguir igual d'endollats al mòbil) tot esgrimint un clàssic argument terraplanista que és que encara hi ha moltes variables explicatives per analitzar. Prova #1 que ha guanyat X
Tenint en compte que establir causalitat és extremadament complicat en aquesta matèria, l'existència d'una associació persistent en molts contextos és molt valuosa per establir prudència i, és clar, també per recordar que la causalitat implica associació. Però ...
Zuck is a master of subtle AI integration into an existing product
In other words, the risk is not simply “screen time,” but unfiltered access to an environment designed to shape behaviour and thinking in ways even adults struggle to resist. Allowing this access before a child has built the inner defences of self‑regulation and critical…
We’re not really debating whether a child should have a device that allows them to text a parent after school or use a maths app. We’re debating whether they should have an open gateway into algorithm‑driven social media platforms before their sense of self and emotional…
This is kind of unusual. They're basically saying: "We know this isn't definitive proof of causation, but the population-level patterns are so alarming and the potential harms so severe that we cannot afford to wait for longitudinal experimental data that might take decades to…
What is the effect of giving children smartphones before the age of 13? It's bad. Strongly associated with poorer mental health and wellbeing. BUT the evidence is largely correlational. What does this mean? 🧵⬇️
“Like it or not, Google has a business to run and it is not going to let something as simple as the desires of its end users get in the way of all that.” ~ @ShortFormErnie 🔗 tedium.co/2025/07/25/goo…
being this proud of degrading your product is wild
Then there’s the remarkable evolution in Search. We’ve created entirely new ways to search like Lens + Circle to Search, and we keep incorporating our most advanced AI models. Now AI Overviews and AI Mode are reimagining the types of queries people can ask and we can answer. The…
You’re right! China is beating our ass in *checks notes* protecting IP and the privacy rights of its people x.com/natejhake/stat…
This is the same dude who says competing with China requires the USA to permit Big Tech to steal all copyright But -- get this -- China's AI Action Plan calls for respect for IP! Unlike the USA's plan ... prepared by David Sucks Ronald Reagan would be *ashamed* of you! 🇺🇸
“It’s deeply foolish & short-sighted to promote an AI policy that demoralizes creators, dissuades them from even establishing careers, & essentially treats them as an unpaid R&D department for the companies creating their synthetic substitutes.” 🙏🏼 h/t @davidclowery
So once the entire corpus of copyrighted material is sucked up into the AIs, ours and those of other nations, the field will be roughly equal and the edge will go to that society which best incentivizes the creation of truly new and original stuff. That's why it's deeply…
Alex Hanna and Emily M. Bender examine the hype behind artificial intelligence in their new book, The AI Con. Below is an excerpt on the invisible labor behind … Source: Rest of World share.google/lbEqpXRrKliimm…
MIT @techrview: Generative AI is evolving fast, making waves across music, media, and more. But beware, it's also a drama queen—hallucinations are its quirky hallmark. As we race towards understanding, remember: AGI is just a shiny buzzword. Enjoy the A… technologyreview.com/2025/07/22/112…
#AI slopaganda comes from "a circle of AI firms, VCs backing those firms, talking shops made up of employees of those firms, and the long tail is the hangers-on, content creators, newsletter writers and ‘marketing experts’ willing to say anything for cash" ft.com/content/242187…
Don’t let hype about AI agents get ahead of reality trib.al/WjFijzo