The Leopard In The Basement Is A Sensible Name
@tlitb
Uncredentialed person
In the light of new information I have to inform followers I'm obliged to include an addendum to my #TimHunt post medium.com/@tlitb/hunt-is…
We Resume J - what page is this? NC - page ?? line no? J - no NC - you have the note, have you read it KS - yes NC - Du was saying the nurse was so intimidateing he'd have to go on some kind of leave if overlapping shifts KS - yes NC - clear to keep DU happy SP needed to be
Really sorry everyone but I’m going to need to skip today and do a live discussing two days tomorrow. It’s just been one of those days!
"The list of the 400 wealthiest Norwegians is almost entirely a list of Norwegians, born in Norway, and who made their money in Norway. [...] The equivalent UK list is [...] far more international, and [...] many of the most wealthy have only tenuous ties to the UK."
"[T]he UK, and London in particular [...] [has] long been a magnet for mobile capital. But that capital remains mobile – many of the most wealthy have only tenuous ties to the UK." share.google/JSiTNHyrENzoHZ…
Live will be later this evening I’m afraid guys - will update
Judge recognising that a TW is a man; why else would he ask about approval for Upton to use the female changing room?
KS - speak to line manager if not content, if not content with response, escalate to their lead, and other ways, up the chain. J - who within Fife may have given approval to DU to use FCR? KS - don't think it was ever discussed, don't know but don't think discussed outwith dept
This is really important. News outlets are routinely saying Peggie ‘confronted’ Beth Upton but that language is now disputed in the tribunal. @BBCNewsScotland @MrHowardSimpson your routine use of ‘confronted’ needs to end. It’s too loaded and now it’s in dispute.
and confrontational manner, we don't see in DU email KS - not in email, but starts saying upsetting and discussed at length on 29th dec and she immediately felt SP was confrontational and aggressive. NC - whether SP was confront/aggress and whether DU was upset are different
Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife: Key points in dramatic hearing @heraldscotland heraldscotland.com/news/25336739.…
We don’t generally post an archive because good journalism is worth paying for. Here’s an SS. Other subheads: ‘Dr Upton’s account ‘flatly contradicted’’ ‘Confidentiality ‘breached’ by Searle’ ‘Career-ending accusations’ ‘’Turning up the heat’ on accusations’ Fantastic round up
The Fife lawyer gave KS an opening at the end whereby SP “as a registered nurse” was held responsible for Upton’s emotional responses and she’s to reflect on how she could have deescalated him. Pure DARVO. KS jumps in “oh yes, she could have addressed it through official…
NC - looking at requests by C, blue answers given by Rs on 17th dec, someone in respondant in Dec last in answer to which staff objected to CM decision to return - lists people - how did they get that answer? KS - don't recall that discussion. P1 - one question, you don't recall
KS - absolutely did not NC - that's why you brought back discussion of incidents with lottie myles at that time KS - do not recall any discussion of that sort NC - page 89 - you say you don' trecall any conv where you pushed back about SP return decision KS - do not
NC -removed> KS - no, some mitigation. NC - no knowledge of shifts, no idea how easy to keep apart long term KS - correct NC - thats what you told SP, at the time reposnsible for SP suspension KS - not what I said NC - said SP was so terrifying needed to be out of dept
J - if asking questions on it, fair for witness to read it. how long is section? NC - 6-7 lines J - fairly long, don't want to waste time NC - can email everyone J - solves? JR - solves immediate prob J - can email to court, can print for witness and how much longer? NC - 10 min
NC - about that, said I communicated was not willing work and KS would ... JR - wasn't aware there was a transcript J - we've talked about this JR - not shared with both sides NC - will share JR - i need it now NC - requested and paid for by us, no obligation
NC - alarming conv, you would remember KS - yes, it would be alarming in hindsight, gathered incidents look like a trend NC - weren't reported because they didn't happen KS - disagree NC - bringing up with CM to change her mind about SP return to work KS - do not recall conv of
NC - order of priority is surprising, more concerned about SP action to DU rather than abandoning patient care? KS - in hindsight we didn't necessarily see they were patient safety issues, all together we saw NC - even in broad terms it says shes so bigotted against DU would