Soteriology101 🩸
@Soteriology101
Former Calvinist, Dr. Leighton Flowers, podcasts discussions on Soteriology from a “Provisionist” Perspective: @leightonflowers
If you ASSUME arguments against the Calvinistic interpretation of Romans 9 are arguments against Paul you’re committing the Question Begging fallacy, which assumes true the very point up for debate. If your theology is strong, it should not rest on fallacious arguments.
I don’t shift the blame for my mistakes to God, Calvinistic theology shifts the blame by teaching that God is the one who decided what my decisions would be. This is just a really bad case of projection.
And the only decisive reason most churches throughout the generations have not become “reformed” is because that’s the way God decided it would be according to the reformed tradition. In other words, according to this logic, God decided that most churches would remain unhealthy…
"I don't think we're ever going to see a healthy evangelical church until the evangelical church is reformed—solidly reformed—where it takes seriously biblical Christianity and its concept of a sovereign God." R.C. Sproul
No one says God needs our permission. And God’s sovereignty is not at all impacted by the freedoms He has chosen to give us. We say with scripture, “But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God,” John 1:12 “For God so…
God doesn’t need your permission to save you.
In Calvinism, God flooded the earth because he was upset that he hadn’t irresistibly regenerated more people.
Calvinists, Would you agree that IF #CALVINISM IS FALSE that it has been divisive and harmful to the Church? Why or why not?
Why do Calvinists keep pointing to Lazarus as an image of spiritual death? He wasn’t an unbeliever. He was a believer who had died physically. A dead believer is a terrible stand-in for a spiritually dead sinner. It totally misses their own point.
No, the mystery of Calvinism is not why someone makes the decision to accept or reject the gospel. That’s decided by God on Calvinism. The mystery for Calvinism is why they are held accountable for a decision they don’t make and why is God not implicated in evil. I’d much…
"You are NOT set free so as to accept the truth, you are freed by accepting truth." 💯
Remember, Calvinists, God sovereignly and unchangeably decreed every AI video on your worldview. 😂
Okay, this is getting out of control! 😂
This 👇🏼 is one of the most asked questions and I’d like to attempt to answer it here briefly with a link to a more thorough reply: The question below is tantamount to asking, “What determined the response of you and your friend,” as if something or someone other than the…
Again I ask, if everyone has the same faith why do some believe and some don’t if they hear the same gospel? And if they don’t have to e same faith why does one have faith and another not?
This 👇🏼 is one of the most asked questions and I’d like to attempt to answer it here briefly with a link to a more thorough reply: The question below is tantamount to asking, “What determined the response of you and your friend,” as if something or someone other than the…
Again I ask, if everyone has the same faith why do some believe and some don’t if they hear the same gospel? And if they don’t have to e same faith why does one have faith and another not?
TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE Devotion to the Quran, or other religious books, doesn't save because it’s untrue. Salvation depends not on the level or genuineness of one's devotion itself, but on the truth of the One to whom they are devoted. If you trade the truth in for lies you…
Which is why it’s an error to teach faith is something God effectually causes in some and makes impossible for the rest.
Exactly, biblical predestination and election isn’t “Calvinistic” I’m glad to see Chad is coming around 😎😁😜
Predestination and election isn't Calvinist, it's biblical.
CALVINISM’S SURVIVAL RESTS ON A FALLACIOUS DEFENSE The motte-and-bailey fallacy is a rhetorical tactic in which an arguer confuses or conflates two positions that are related but differ significantly in strength and difficulty of defense: a modest, easily defensible position…
For the record, and for those who might be interested, there are 349 sources in the bibliography in my book. There are 607 footnotes in the book. Of the 349 sources, 2 came from my friend Tony Byrne. Almost 300 came from books *in my own personal library.* Truth matters.
Not only is this a slanderous attempt to demean Dr. Allen, it also has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ARGUMENT! Whether a citation was provided by an assistant or not has 0 to do with the subject. This is another one of White’s fallacious strategies to avoid the major points of…
Here is the latest example of White doing the very same thing he accuses others of doing. White for years has slammed @LostMyHats as “judging from afar,” and yet here is White doing that very thing in suggesting I am giving Allen his sources in his latest “Liberating Romans”…