Ricardo Escobar
@Guitardo7
Follower of Christ! Husband and Father! To Live is Christ and to die is Gain https://youtube.com/@The_Biblical_Layman
That’s the beauty of imputation Jesus is the new Adam and he is perfect did not fail His righteousness is given to us and our sin is transferred to Him. So no He doesn’t have to be a sinner to atone for sinners. He needs to have what Adam had a first The divine nature…
What does Zach here have in common with the Provisionist and open theist?
In Progressive Theology’s theme park, everyday is Opposite Day! There are four biblical references to humanity being made in the image and likeness of God (Gen 1:26-27; 5:1-2; 9:6; Jas 3:9) but vastly more to us being natural born sinners! Where do we even begin? ²¹ And when…
Very well said Derrik There are those that don’t want to understand and so misrepresent though they are told over and over again they are not representing correctly 👏
If @RFupdates came out with a more thorough explanation of what WLC said, TheoBros would cry “he’s walking it back” or “they’re gaslighting us about what he said.” You can’t help people who want to misunderstand because they have an agenda.
Is this LITERALLY true? Romans 3:13 “Their throat is an open grave; they use their tongues to deceive.” “The venom of asps is under their lips.” Paul is quoting POETRY Poets often use HYPERBOLE, exaggeration for emphasis Only those with an AGENDA take this LITERALLY
Is this LITERALLY true? Romans 3:13 “Their throat is an open grave; they use their tongues to deceive.” “The venom of asps is under their lips.” Paul is quoting POETRY Poets often use HYPERBOLE, exaggeration for emphasis Only those with an AGENDA take this LITERALLY
Yes!
The Reformed Church (Presbyterians, Lutherans, and Anglicans) desperately needs new confessions that clearly commit to: 1. No women clergy—including ruling elders, teaching pastors, deacons, or liturgical participants. 2. No membership for homosexuals. You cannot profess…
Other interpretation Even as God chose (a type of person not an actual person) in Him (when they believed not before the world) to be Holy and blameless
A more Calvinistic rendering of Ephesians 1:4-5 “Even as he chose us [to be] in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be [saved] before him. In love he predestined us for [salvation] to himself as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will,”
To be Holy and Blameless implies salvation beforehand 😂 Chosen in Christ means United to Christ Before the world really means (in time when someone had faith) according to non-Calvinistic interpretation. Gladly will debate it but we know the answer
A more Calvinistic rendering of Ephesians 1:4-5 “Even as he chose us [to be] in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be [saved] before him. In love he predestined us for [salvation] to himself as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will,”
Sometimes misunderstanding is purposeful 🤔 I can think of some people like this lol And no not referring to the guy in OP
Hot take: WLC and @RFupdates owe us theobros nothing. If you think that WLC is denying God is omniscient then you've been living under a rock. Sometimes misunderstanding is purposeful.
What a trash take
PSA: I deleted X from my phone so my interactions here will be sporadic. PSA: Also, a trash atonement theology.
I have sheep not of the fold I must bring them… Was Paul a sheep in any sense? 🤔
the only issue i have here with this is the "election" implication". "my sheep" means they are already following (i.e. believers). afterall, that's what sheep do.
Coming from the guy that won’t debate Hilarious
When Cowards like this guy and Bryson Gray all over X...will talk talk talk about scripture but then won't defend their claims? This is the effeminate passive aggressive "christianity" that's getting crushed on the internet. Obey the Lord and stand up for what you believe.
Incorrect on all accounts More creeds and confession Does Pastor Stephen not say the Apostles creed? Matt does not deny Sola Scriptura someone as sharp as Stephen should know this He denied solo scriptura/biblicism which we all should.
It shouldn't be a surprise that Matthew Barrett is now an Anglican. He denied Sola Scriptura, likening it to "solo" Scriptura. History has shown that liturgical use of creeds and confessions drifts people away from Scripture, not towards it. This pattern will continue.
Revelation 22 is the scariest chapter in the Bible once you see it It haunts you
Yes run but not away rather towards
A couple of years ago, I caught some flak for critiquing Matthew Barrett’s (and others’) methodologies in this message, titled “What Does Athens Have to do With the Church?” When men start referring to the Reformation as “renewal” . . . . . . RUN. sermonaudio.com/sermons/719231…
Some Of you should do a study on Heaven and earth Let me give you a head start It doesn’t always mean and it’s not always talking about the actual Heaven and earth
Now do the word for Trinity
The 6 Biblical Covenants of Scripture
Wait wait Won’t and can’t Seems like Someone is making a distinction that he himself doesn’t believe is valid when it is used on Him 🤨 How many times has Chuck rejected my can’t and won’t distinction? 🤨 Also some of the things Chuck is referring to God did in…
This is a straw man. No one believes God “doesn’t have the right” to do something. We say, that because God is good and righteous and just, there are things that He WONT and even CANNOT do. Because God is trustworthy, He will never violate His character or contradict Himself.
I can’t stand this system
This is the only way scripture makes sense
😂 Me: wow our boy is so a good boy Wife: try watching him for the day then come talk to me 😂 Both are funny