Mason
@webdevMason
We have to stop the ticks. Flood the earth? Modern day ice age? I'm spitballing. There are no bad ideas.
I probably understated the "really, really loves you" bit Like, while your kid is little it doesn't even occur to her that she *could* not love you
You know, at the end of the day it is exactly what it sounds like. There's a little person in your house with high needs who really, really loves you and you are responsible for her being okay 24/7. Is that a delight or a horror? You tell me
To put this hypothetical in perspective note that there are only around 10^80 *atoms* in the *observable universe*.
To put this hypothetical in perspective note that there are only around 10^80 *atoms* in the *observable universe*.
IMO trying to force a sort of religious guilt on people for not forcibly rearranging their own empathy circuits according to a continuously evolving crowdsourced logic is EA's original sin Care about what you care about, try to act on the world accordingly
I have to be honest, even if it gets me cancelled: nothing has turned me against the effective altruist crowd more than "shrimp welfare."
The chief value of this post is demonstrating that the philosophy majors who promote this sort of thing are not only hopelessly blinkered, but full of contempt for people like you
Okay let's clarify some things. Link below
I hate this so much
i once worked as a live-in nanny for 3 small kids in hawaii. the parents were burnt out and didn’t really like parenting. they had 2 nannies covering 7am-8pm 7 days a week. the dad worked a few hours a day and the mom didn’t work. years later i saw the dad had started a blog…