Sean Donahue
@seantankerous
Lacking in characters.
My scintillating content may be found at: [email protected]
On the latest effort by fossil friends -- supported by amicus US Chamber of Commerce, which is filled with companies that support climate action -- to block even the most conventional controls on emissions from our biggest sources. legal-planet.org/2024/08/23/cle…
How about a constitutional amendment to establish what we thought was established in 1787: that the President is not above the law?
The Court has corrected the "nitrous oxide" references in the Good Neighbor decision. In the coming days, I'll be noting add'l errors that should prompt more far-reaching changes. (Seriously, EPA should prevail -- as the Act recognizes, we need controls on interstate pollution).
The unselfishness and humbleness of this team is an example for anyone that plays any sport! So proud of you @celtics congrats to everyone from top to bottom! Congrats Al!! #humblydone #nbafinals #celtics #platanopower #banner18 #🇩🇴🇩🇴🇩🇴
2024 WORLD CHAMPIONS 🏆
Make it make sense. Fossil fuel power plants cause about 1/4 of U.S.CO2 emissions. And the industry *seemed* to support EPA’s efforts to cut them. Now this📷 from @Edison_Electric, which reps companies like @SCE @portlandgeneral @xcelenergy @Exelon?!?📷 eenews.net/articles/ediso…
Thread on Good Neighbor argument from the amazing Kirti Datla x.com/kirti_datla/st…
Section 706 of the APA did not apply in Chevron, which was a Clean Air Act case under a significantly different review statute. So accusing Justice Stevens of "whiffing" on Section 706 in Chevron is a self-own. Let's see if the Court goes there too.
Where, exactly, does the Constitution "say" that the interpretive power rests exclusively with courts? Answer: nowhere. And there's a fair bit of language in it that would suggest that the Executive has a key interpretive role.