Unauthorized Narrative
@mgEyesOpen
Susan Rice gave more context in her book. The WH counsel asked her to write this because they were concerned everyone would find out the Obama WH was directing things. Thanks to Tulsi’s release we know they were right to be worried - there was zero legitimate national security…
They have to build criminal cases, and there are challenges because of statutes of limitations, but if you read between the lines of the documents, some of these folks were in CYA mode even back then. See
Ridiculous NYT-labeling aside, @Cernovich was ahead of the curve on Tulsi.
One of the biggest mistakes the Democrat establishment made: Coordinating with the NYT in 2019 to smear Tulsi Gabbard as an alt-right conspiracy theorist who was working with Russia. That action created a series of steps that ultimately led to where we are today.
One of the biggest mistakes the Democrat establishment made: Coordinating with the NYT in 2019 to smear Tulsi Gabbard as an alt-right conspiracy theorist who was working with Russia. That action created a series of steps that ultimately led to where we are today.
🚨 BREAKING - PRESIDENT TRUMP: "DNI, oh, where's Tulsi? She's the hottest one on the room right now, because she found out with certainty...Barack Hussein Obama led a group of people, they cheated without question!" YES 👏 And MORE is on the way! "You…
🚨 BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard just said *TOMORROW* she is releasing more Trump-Russia 2016 Hoax Files that directly "REFUTE" Barack Hussein Obama's statement today. Holy smokes, Tulsi came ready. "We will be releasing further documents tomorrow that will REFUTE that…
🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP: “TULSI IS THE HOTTEST ONE IN THE ROOM RIGHT NOW!” “She found out Barack Hussein Obama led a group of people and they cheated in the election.” “Tulsi told me ‘you’ve seen nothing yet.’” 🔥 “Would you say there is even a little question there Tulsi? She says…
David Corn ran the Steele Dossier story *before* the election in a desperate attempt to keep Trump from winning. He also happened to run his story the exact same day the Alfa Bank hoax was published by Franklin Foer, showing it was a coordinated attack (i.e. a conspiracy).
NEW: Tulsi Gabbard is running a dangerous and brazen disinformation campaign. She's gaslighting the public, abusing the intelligence community to protect Donald Trump, and undermining national security. Read all about it in my latest article. motherjones.com/politics/2025/…
If the fictional story that Trump colluded with Russia deserved to be at the top of every single news program and every newspaper for 18 months, how much more should the TRUE STORY of top Democrat operatives and media conspiring to take Trump down be covered?
Every time the Washington Post, CNN, the New York Times, Margaret Brennan, The Atlantic, etc., lie and say this story is not a big deal, they are perpetuating their seditious conspiracy. Creative minds should think about what legal exposure they have for their role in this.
The reason why they're trying to bury this explosive story is obvious: our corporate media were active and willing agents in the seditious conspiracy. They certainly can't report on the fact that they were involved in these crimes against the country.
The recent revelations about the origins of the Russia collusion hoax against the American people are the biggest story in America right now. It's the biggest scandal in our history. And yet look at how most media outlets are handling the news. Ignoring, downplaying...
Dear @hakeemjeffries: You sound rattled. If @Article3Project’s ethics complaint against you “means nothing to me,” why are you talking about it. (Maybe we’re over the target?)
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) is losing his mind now that an ethics complaint has been filed against him for the defamatory lies he said about US Attorney for NJ Alina Habba. This all stems from Habba indicting Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) for assaulting DHS at an NJ ICE facility.
From President Trump: “We just completed a massive Deal with Japan, perhaps the largest Deal ever made. Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 Billion Dollars into the United States, which will receive 90% of the Profits...” 🇺🇸🇯🇵
Obama: “We have said, and I will confirm, that this happened at the highest levels of the Russian government.” We know as of December 16 Obama had read the dossier. No other “evidence” of this exists anywhere else.
More here during his 10 minute appearance. "People should pay attention to what our intelligence community says." This was a week after Obama ordered an "intel assessment" into Russia's role in the election including "hacks" and "cyber" issues. More importantly--Obama put the…
Obama cited the Steele Dossier during his December 16, 2016 press conference, before it was published. Oops.
Obama: “We have said, and I will confirm, that this happened at the highest levels of the Russian government.” We know as of December 16 Obama had read the dossier. No other “evidence” of this exists anywhere else.
If Russia was trying to help Trump, why didn’t they release the information from the Renteria memo? The only explanation the IC gave was maybe they were trying to protect their sources and methods 🙄
The ICA that Obama ordered concluded Russia was trying to damage Clinton and help Trump, yet Russia never released what an IC task force identified as "the most explosive information that the Russians potentially would leak."
Important point. - The FBI did not investigate claims about Lynch in the Renteria memo because one minor piece of it was flawed. - As a contrast, they used the Steele Dossier as the basis to keep the Russia hoax going despite almost all of it being completely wrong.
It’s all about the renteria memo They didn’t find it was Russian disinfo. They found it was bad russian Intel and for proof they cited this …that Comey favored the GOP. They knew he favored Clinton, so it undermined the rest of the report
Comey on whether it was appropriate to investigate Lynch: "You ought to have more of a reason to go forward." Comey on whether it was appropriate to investigate Flynn: "I sent them."
Brennan called Trump treasonous when he refused to endorse the conclusions of the ICA. Did he accuse his own intel officials of treason when they challenged the conclusions as well?
Documents reviewed exclusively by The Federalist expose how bad Brennan's corruption was in words of others in IC community. By @MZHemingway with some contributions by me. @FDRLST link to follow. 1/