MB
@TrustIsEarnd
Dear FBI GC: I'm an independent investigator and journalist.
50,000th follower is gonna be crowned Most Ghey Fool Follower: and will be crowned in a crown passing ceremony by @TrustIsEarnd
There are two ways to read this sentence. Here’s how I read it: Barack Hussein "Barry Soetoro" Obama, Christopher Steele, Hillary Clinton, the DNC, Michael Sussman, former FBI Director James Comey, former CIA Director John Brennan, Peter Strzok, former Director of National…
Be Ghey Follow @FOOL_NELSON , like @TrustIsEarnd does
Key point from Undead: “When it said Clinton was doing bad shit, they said it lacked credibility. Then they turned around and used it to indict the Russians.”
Source: The source of this intelligence is the same as the source who provided the Clinton Plan Intelligence, Renteria memo, and the information supporting Mueller's indictment in the Concord case. That's right. When it said Clinton was doing bad shit, they said it lacked…
Source: The source of this intelligence is the same as the source who provided the Clinton Plan Intelligence, Renteria memo, and the information supporting Mueller's indictment in the Concord case. That's right. When it said Clinton was doing bad shit, they said it lacked…
Seems an appropriate time to get Mr Fool over 50k followers peeps : he @ 49.9k
Btw if I had to guess T1 is Sergei Mikhailov or some entity in his network including Ilya Sachkov, his employee Nikita Kislitsin, and/or Shaltai Boltai. Oleg Smolenkov is another possibility, but I think T1 is in the Mikhailov web. x.com/FOOL_NELSON/st…
This smells so bad The memo was real, the investigation was fake, DWS did tell donors the MYE was handled, because Lynch told them it was handled. Agents never really looked at the servers or even the thumb drives. James Baker told them they couldn’t look at the thumb drives.…
Comey with Obama White House: "You ought to have more of a reason to go forward." Comey with Trump White House: "I sent them."
Whats weird is the difference between how McCabe treated Lynch and how Michael Flynn was treated. You're not gonna ask the AG directly if she had those conversations with Renteria? If NOTHING ELSE its relevant to assessing the reliability of the intel. They didnt want the answer
They never even pulled Lynch’s or Renterias emails or comms. They very much acted as if they believed it
Indeed- this was McCabes opportunity to tell Lynch to watch her ass when conspiring with the Clinton campaign.
It requires absurd pretzel logic to view this as anything other than McCabe signaling to Lynch she had nothing to fear b/c the FBI had no intention of looking for the underlying communications. It requires absurd pretzel logic to excuse the FBI for its failure to look for them.
Comey, McCabe, and Strzok didnt feel that the Attorney General of the United States giving real time updates to Hillary Clintons campaign director regarding a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton merited attention. Not to mention discussion of destruction of evidence.
Of course investigating actual crimes by Clinton weren't important. The FBI needed to wrap up that investigation so they could move onto something that "mattered," like hoaxes manufactured by the Clinton campaign and Obama administration.
Remember, our IC took the Steele Dossier seriously and buried the Renteria reports.
No wonder we haven't seen the Renteria Memo, it absolutely wrecks Obama!
It wasn’t Russian disninfo. They concluded it was bad russian Intel analysis and puffery. Yet Lynch never even denied it The Renteria memo is real, the investigation was fake
Its worse than disinterest- The validity of this intel was huge to the intelligence community. - Was the 5 eyes partner that provided it on the level (the Dutch surely)? - Was it Russian disinformation? - If not, how good was Russian intel gathering against us?
I wonder if @cnn will ask Andy McCabe on air tonight: "what up with your incuriosity about former Atty Gen. Lynch's sharing gov. info. with the Hillary Campaign?" "why so shy Andy" ( they weren't shy with @GenFlynn
Whats weird is the difference between how McCabe treated Lynch and how Michael Flynn was treated. You're not gonna ask the AG directly if she had those conversations with Renteria? If NOTHING ELSE its relevant to assessing the reliability of the intel. They didnt want the answer
Whats weird is the difference between how McCabe treated Lynch and how Michael Flynn was treated. You're not gonna ask the AG directly if she had those conversations with Renteria? If NOTHING ELSE its relevant to assessing the reliability of the intel. They didnt want the answer
McCabe had a problem here. If he did even the basics of his job and asked Lynch if she had spoken to Renteria and had those conversations: - She says yes, and a criminal investigation is necessary against her -She says no, and that evidence of Russian interference is contradicted
"a little bit weird", I would say so.