Joseph Rios 🦡
@PolemicsJoe
I am a Slave to Christ, a proponent of the 1689f LBC, a Husband, and a Father. M.Div., Enlisted Vet and Chaplain USAR, Doctoral Student.
Conference on Of Justification, So Cal, Nov, two Renihans, Tom Hicks, Steve Meister, VanDrunen scrbpc.org
Best article contra paedobaptism by Greg Welty. I haven’t seen this one referenced as much in recent years. Don’t miss it. founders.org/library/a-crit…
It's really not that I like Webbon that much. It's that they keep putting out hit pieces that are the dumbest thing I've read in a while: "The problem isn’t that Joel Webbon said something dangerous. The problem is that he said something true, and for an entire wing of…
Why is there supposed to submit to their husbands as the church does to Christ, but Christ doesn't set it to the church, therefore Christ in the church being a picture of the Gospel excludes mutual submission.
New Testament Marriage is a submission competition. “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ.” (Eph 5:21) “Walk in the way of love, JUST AS Christ loved us and gave himself up for us...” (Eph. 5:2)
Not quite. In Scripture, the Abrahamic Covenant is called the Covenant of Circumcision (Acts 7:8). You may not divorce the two. What Paul does in Gal 3 is distinguish between two different promises made to Abraham. See this thread x.com/brandon_adams/…
The Cov of Circumcision and the NC are two different cov. They are related, for sure, yet they are distinct. The CoC was made with Israel according to the flesh (Rom 4:1;9:3-5; 1 Cor 10:18 KJV), while the NC is made with Israel according to the Spirit (Jn 6:45; Rom 9:6; Gal 6:16)
Have you heard of the Council of Trent? It’s mutual. Trent was a dogmatic council, meaning it’s your church’s official position on Protestants, and it anathematizes us to hell 125 times. In other words, you started it.
I assume my Presbyterian friends would not come to a “rebaptism”
To my Reformed Baptist brethren, if you were invited to an infant baptism by a friend or family member, would you go? Why or why not?
Tor F: Our obedience to Christ as believers adds to our reward in Christ for eternity.
Dust covers desecrate the book. They subtract from the book by adding to it. Burn them.
Typically, on the dust cover of that book you decided to desecrate, there’s info you won’t find in the book itself.
Echo chambers are a real thing. This is what happens when Secondary things, like progressive dispensationalism, become so important that you can't tolerate critique.
T or F: Scripture is just as sufficient for AI Prompt Engineering as it is for theology.
If "reformed biblicism" is really just the historical understanding of Scripture from the reformed confessions, then it is somewhat useless, and one just aught to admit that they are confessional.
Republicans must stop electing women. You cannot have a conservative movement that is led by women.
“… apart from His full and active obedience, we could not be saved.”
John MacArthur’s statement on justification is absolute gold: “We affirm…apart from His full and active obedience, we could not be saved.”
“… sola Scriptura was never meant as a denial of the usefulness of the Christian tradition as a subordinate norm in theology and as a significant point of reference for doctrinal formulas and argumentation.” - Richard Muller
And here we have the "no true biblicist" fallacy. Apparently, we have run out of Scotsmen.
No one really believes what you call "biblicism." It's just a way to undermine sola scriptura.