Roy馃嚚馃嚘
@GrandpaRoy2
馃嚚馃嚘 馃嚭馃嚘 Grandfather, OSINT of Ukrainian and Russian sources: FPVs, drone munitions, EW, landmines. 鉂わ笍my family (grandchildren!), reading, and Kaja Kallas.
I think I'm in love with Kaja Kallas, but my wife is OK with it.

During WW2's combined bomber offensive, unitary incendiary bombs were found to be five times as effective as high explosive, mass for mass, at destroying buildings & structures. But the bomber barons were hung up on the tonnage delivered, not their effects. Success Metrics馃У 1/
Ukrainian drones dropping some sort of incendiary mix on Russian positions
HELP WANTED: Ukraine has approximately 20 ATACMs surface to surface missiles, and the US restricts their use. The US has not sent a single ATACMs to Ukraine, which needs them to strike deep targets in the occupied areas.
I will find the time.
Written a 16 part long read series on field defences, if anyone has time. Link in reply
This video makes clear that a lot of US Army Infantry leaders who have been pushing the line that "FPV drones can't do combat in close terrain" just had their "Reality Check bounce." 1/
Ukrainian fiber-optic drone moving through a Russian trench in Belgorod
Unlike FPVs, ground robots or UGVs can take serious investment to produce. A bit of money in the right place can make a big difference, as Ukraine's TERMIT shows - my take for Forbes in comments below
1/ Corrupt Russian officers often extort large bribes for not sending men into what are likely to be suicidal assaults. Men are hidden from inspectors to prevent exposure. A Russian soldier explains how the scam works; "the attitude is like towards cattle," he says. 猬囷笍