yajnadevam
@yajnadevam
ॐ अग्निमीळे पुरोहितं यज्ञस्य देवमृत्विजम् होतारं रत्नधातमम् Join our discord to discuss SVC script and help with project
Deciphering Indus script as a cryptogram academia.edu/78867798/Decip…
The number of vocative forms compared to accusative, genitive and dative in the Rigveda for the top three deities: Indra, Agni and Soma are:
If you don’t have the industrial capacity to replenish faster than your losses in battle, you will never win a protracted war. How much it applies to aircraft is unclear
Reality is not difficult to understand, provided we are honest with events of history Tejas was designed to replace the MiG 21 MiG-21s are going and Tejas is nowhere near replacing them IAF is down to 29 sqns as a result. By the time Tejas fills the numbers, Jaguars and MiG 29s…
Are there any languages where XXX can be written in NNN ways? This guy seems to think that his familiarity is the only litmus test of the realm of possibility and anything he is unfamiliar with must be impossible. Another example of arguments from incredulity coming from a place…
Sumerian doesnt just use logograms like the Japanese use Kanji as a size optimization to syllabic alternatives. Sumerian is a polyvalent script where the sound value changes based on what is next to it. The sign du(𒁺) can be read as ĝin (go), gub (stand), dù(build) depending…
Summarizing the status of the repetitive points over the last couple of weeks. I will mute/block them for a couple of months. If anything more interesting comes up, others can alert me. Q: Why many symbols per sound? A: Necessary feature of all pristine scripts. Q: Why…
Nothing new here, all these points have been made in the last three years and addressed. Instead of saying "you are wrong", perhaps try to see if the readings can be improved or if a particular sign has a different value, things become clearer. You are just generating noise,…
x.com/Ugrashravas/st…
My notifications are flooded with the same repeated noise. I have probably missed responding to many tweets. I have to either mute or block this crowd if they don't slow down their barrage of the same repeated points: 1. "Read Panini" ie The sanskrit is wrong because they are…
Guy who was claiming that a dictionary with all possible words is necessary for the dictionary method is making judgements. Have you solved a single cryptogram in your life?
Lol. YD still hasn't -computed his own unicity distance -understood what a reversible transformation is -defined what his plaintext or ciphertext is (per Shannon ofc; he has made up some alt defns without math sources) -understood what redundancy is Pls fix basics b4 lecturing
RV 1.66.7 सेनाइव । सृष्टा । अमम् । दधाति । अस्तुः । न । दिद्युत् । त्वेषप्रतीका ॥ RV 5.54.3 स्तनयत्अमाः I'm gonna stop addressing your grammar points, since most of them essentially boil down to "this usage is unfamiliar to me, so it must be wrong"
>listed with only male gender (ie pure noun in your world) Where do you even make such insane assumptions from? The takṣaka example is entirely different from ur case. You've translated ama (actually disease; fine, at best, "strength") as "he who is strong" [=matup is needed]
This guy is still lecturing me on "basic misconceptions" From someone who did not know what redundancy meant when he wrote it. Still doesn't know and thinks that exact grammar is required for the dictionary method, despite me illustrating with an example how even a two word/6…
I suggest you read this fully - You seem to only have skimmed through it. Reading it properly will clear most of these basic misconceptions ugrashravas.github.io/paniniprotocol…
Overall, your conversational and verse composition skills (which are admirable), do not make you a master on what Sanskrit was in 2600 BCE. It is absurd to make this claim, even if the stuff you said below was relevant. I'm addressing it here to show how pedantic, outright false…
8 words Unattested: {रव=roarer, अम=strong (adjective), सक्ष, जठल, standalone धार=sustainer, रह=yield} (6/8= 75%) Of which, Broken compounding rule = {रव+अम} (2/8=25%) Actual cases that are dissimilar to stems: {अमं, नरं} (2/8=25%) Similar analysis for rest. Pick an inscription
Again, you are quoting things you google with shallow understanding, conflating my explanatory tweets to your own questions with paragraphs from random things you found on the web but you have no understanding of the subject matter. Plaintext simply means what you can read…
Ad hominems & deflections usually are a sign of admission of defeat x.com/Ugrashravas/st…
At this point the conversation is no longer earnest. This guy has started mocking anything I say, which would be tolerable if he knew what he was talking about. This entire group that is soaking up my time essentially has the following issues: 1. The are unaware of how ancient…
"Key" is a transformation from plaintext space to ciphertext space In YD's case, both spaces are same => There's no concept of "Key" => There's no concept of equivocation in "keyspace" => There's no concept of Unicity Distance => [I'll let the audience fill in the blanks here]
This shows that anusvara and /n/ are interchangeable in scripts. Its a point in favor of the IVC decipherment, not against it.
right and प्रंशु <-> प्रन्शु works for the same reason, ं assimilates to न् in the presence of श्. If this was interchangeability, then you'd see अनु as अंउ or गंगा as गन्गा.
Ignorance of the difference between anusvara and labial and also utter unfamiliarity of how ancient (and even modern) scripts work.
This means that @yajnadevam's very first translation of 3 jar signs as /ananam/ is built on a false basis. अं is NOT interchangeable with अन् when followed by a vowel. It has to be अम् And अममम् is not a Sanskrit word x.com/TheButterThief…
Harappans should only have used words approved by our friend. Also, show the statistics where you computed them or I will assume that you made it up on the spot ... like your claim that vocative is rare in prayers.
Some 70% of his words aren't there in literature Remaining 20% break some compounding rule or such Remaining 10% actually use cases but get them wrong
There are no "key steps". The derivation can be done with many different starting sets and they all give the same results because of the way intersection works. Also anusvara is not /m/. m is a labial. A look at many anusvara words like वंश शंख etc shows that they were…
Also, is अननन् still considered the key step? I wonder if it's that unique a fit. Since श,ष,स,ह are the same class, one could as well come up with सहसः etc. (सहस् genitive, visargas are free apparently).
There are many arguments presented that ultimately amount to "I would have done better if I was a Harappan". Of course you would, you have the benefit of 6000 years of hindsight. These bold statements about how Harappans would and would not create a script seem to be from an…
Ancient coin from Kaushambi with what looks like an Indus jar sign on the reverse.
