Joshua Primero
@talekhinezh
Lover of risk, nature, engineering, the unknown. Co-Founder & CEO https://boldprotocol.io
First space where I talk about Bold Native with the Beem man himself. Should be fun, bring your coffee!
Bask in the glory protocol big brains featuring @talekhinezh who will be joining the 5th Crypto Coffee Beems space! Bold team to the fuuuckn muuuun x.com/i/spaces/1MnGn…
Bold Native Demo: 1-shot CEX USDC -> Radix XRD (uses @CaviarNine pool) Demonstrates the ability to single-step onboard any user from a CEX to a native token without actually being listed. This is impossible with normal bridges as you run into the gas problem: you need gas in…
Bold Native Demo: 1-shot CEX USDC -> Radix Test-USDC Primary purpose of Bold Native is to make Dapp user/liquidity onboarding as easy and fast as possible wherever they may be (CEX, bitcoin, another network, etc.). Follow our progress here: discord.gg/hsYp8c7EKJ
BTCFi Today, how many steps between BTC to <some-lending-protocol> on <some-network> via <some-bridge>: 1. Get <some-network> wallet 2. Buy <some-network> gas 3. Transfer <some-network> gas to <some-network> wallet 4. Swap BTC for wBTC on CEX 5. Get ethereum wallet 6. Buy ETH 7.…
This guy's a beast! Bartosz a few years back also audited the code @iamyulong and I wrote for Radix Engine and called it "the most interesting audit I've ever done." Yulong and I are back at it again now working on Bold Native, cross-chain interoperability to the next level.…
I did it. I found first "real critical issue" on @HackenProof . I am looking forward to presenting story behind it on @ETHWarsaw 😄 By the way, you can meet me today (30.06) in Cannes on lu.ma/app26j6x event and later on EthCC
I think I will be a perpetual v3-v4 climber forever. Been stuck here for the past 10 years, never worse never better lol.
A poker way of expressing this: going all in with AA with your entire net worth is +EV but who's dumb enough to do that
1/ How can I put this? "Expected utility maximizers don't maximize utility." Why? Because utility is not usually an ergodic quantity in the mathematical models used by economists, and maximizing its expected value doesn't mean much in the real world.
Vibe coding as a protocol engineer... So far it's saved so much time with coding tasks which are menial but easy to verify (some of the things I hate the most with low level programming). For example, replacing code with new structures and automatically create…
Trying to look up some books on market making in the library and I ran into this. Wtf!
Lower-level documentation on Radix Engine for anyone interested in protocol architecture/execution specifics (not quite a specification yet): radixdlt.github.io/radixdlt-scryp…
A different way of putting it is a difference in application abstraction. In EVM, you have logic which reads/writes into a byte address space. In SUI MoveVM, you have movable objects with logic. In Radix Engine, you have movable resources and components with logic.
"On Radix there is a "fast, simple and correct" way of doing things, and in things like SUI there is "many" ways of doing things." "Radix has built an OS for finance. SUI has just built a language with an improved database." This is exactly why I prefer Sui. There are endless…
The transaction does not bother with guarantees on the execution of smart contracts but rather on the output an execution produces. This output may include assets so you can add assertions that X amount of some asset has been given to you when calling a smart contract.
This is for @radixdlt While Radix transactions specify intent rather than explicit substates, how does the system ensure accurate execution of smart contracts based on transaction intent? Are there any potential ambiguities or discrepancies between transaction intent and smart…