Take Back the Truth

"What Greenpeace and other extremist groups don’t grasp is that their efforts to stop oil and natural gas development would weaken the United States, embolden rogue nations, hurt our economy and have very little, if any, impact on the environment."👇

Radical environmentalist attacks on US energy are a direct threat to our national security. We must never sacrifice our energy independence to green policies that ultimately benefit America's adversaries. foxnews.com/opinion/threat…

"The jury saw through the smokescreen of 'peaceful protest' and recognized the truth: Greenpeace’s actions crossed the line into lawlessness, costing our state millions and leaving scars on our communities." Read more below: inforum.com/opinion/letter…

"The First Amendment protects the right to free speech, but it does not shield those who carry out destructive protest or break the law."👇 dallasnews.com/opinion/commen…

Nearly a decade later, North Dakota is finally getting some justice from the courts over the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. Our state should also get an apology from the former president. inforum.com/opinion/column…

"Energy is not a sector of the economy; energy is the economy. Without access to affordable and reliable energy, businesses cannot grow, and citizens cannot heat and cool their homes." - @TrishaJCoffee

New audio spot! At Energy Transfer, we’re proud to help power America—transporting 30% of the nation’s natural gas. Our impact goes beyond energy. In 2024, we paid nearly $850 million in taxes across 40 states, and donated to over 400 nonprofits. youtube.com/watch?v=ueMSei…

Did you know 96% of the products we use come from oil and natural gas? From your sunglasses and cell phone to your clothes, toothbrush, and even life-saving medical devices—it’s all gas. Our world needs oil and gas, and people rely on us to deliver it. youtube.com/watch?v=8a7dmy…

“The most interesting part of the story was that an energy company & its top executive had finally stood up to the strong-arm tactics routinely employed by professional environmental political operatives...rather than caving to their ridiculous demands."🔽 washingtontimes.com/news/2025/jun/…

This lawsuit against Greenpeace marks a turning point in holding activist groups accountable for disruptive and misleading campaigns targeting critical energy projects. washingtontimes.com/news/2025/jun/…

Fact: The trial in North Dakota provided sufficient evidence to hold Greenpeace liable, despite claims to the contrary. Read more below: takebackthetruth.com/fact-the-trial…

New audio spot! youtube.com/watch?v=Tf_oCL… Oil and gas power more than just our cars—they fuel our economy, support millions of jobs, and help fund vital services like schools and hospitals. The U.S. leads the world in production, and Americans reap the rewards.

"These groups, like Greenpeace, don’t understand that speech was never the issue in the North Dakota trial. It was Greenpeace’s actions that led to its expensive penalties..." dailycaller.com/2025/04/02/man…

"The trial exposed some of the ways that a big-money NGO—and a cadre of radical activists—can steer an initially peaceful protest toward mayhem." 👇 commentary.org/articles/james…

Like the later BLM and anti-Israel protests, the 2016 Standing Rock anti-pipeline occupation showed how a small group of hard-core activists can push a demonstration toward violence. The Greenpeace lawsuit helped expose how mainstream nonprofits often fund these extremists.

ICYMI: Last week, a North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay $667 million in damages for its campaign in 2016-2017 to block the Dakota Access Pipeline. Check out our blog post: energytransferfacts.com/blog/greenpeac…

"The jury has now spoken: perpetrators of violence and vandalism cannot avoid accountability merely by claiming it’s their First Amendment right." @natlawreview natlawreview.com/article/greenp…

"While commentators have focused on Greenpeace’s tenuous future in the wake of the decision, the more important outcome is that the trial set an important precedent that violent protests cannot be excused as a form of free speech." Read more below🔽 natlawreview.com/article/greenp…