conway!!
@pickledjarr
24 💚 he/him 💚 🔞 acct isnt nsfw but i rt suggestive jokes/art so minors please dnf! 🔞 💚 ABSOLUTELY NO PROSHIP/PROPARA/SHED/RQ/ZOOS
Grid Adopts! 30USD/slot, +3USD for a cutie mark! Two ponies from the same row is 35USD!! Examples of my designs below :3
and then because there's a moral panic over pedophiles, pointing out this basic fact that looking at porn as a teenager is totally 100% normal and expected becomes a sign you're an Evil Groomer PDF File Diddy Ahh Whatever so nobody dares speak up, which is how we got here
If this bill gets passed, it's because you grease balls on the internet couldn't stop infighting on whether the Left or the Right was responsible for this. If you give a damn about anonymity and censorship, we need to let it be known *TOGETHER*. LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD
Today is my birthday, I made a selection of arts in honor of this You can give me a gift by reposting this post I will be very grateful, thank you very much in advance! ^^
Made this early 2010s inspired Ghetsis tribute AMV what do we think? 🤤
Access to LGBTQ help subbreddits banned Footage of footage of the current Gaza genocide banned Footage of protests banned But sure let's focus on the fact that some porn sites require ID which will inevitably lead to kids making their way onto more dangerous sites
"modern puritanism" and it's not giving porn to minors 🙄
notice it says "themes" and "implications". this means completely non-explicit content is ALSO banned. your favorite indie game that "treats these dark topics respectfully" is banned
Itchio quietly added these new guidelines on content for the site. Massive blow to adult creators. Adding this silently is yet another PR SNAFU
The worst part of this online safety act is you can't complain about it without being accused of a porn addict.
last bullet point is most- interesting I guess? or revealing? In that uniquely among these points, there's nothing morally or legally impugnable about "fetish involving bodily waste", it's just banned PURELY because it's icky
Itchio quietly added these new guidelines on content for the site. Massive blow to adult creators. Adding this silently is yet another PR SNAFU
if an ENCYCLOPEDIA is in the strictest category of censoring and ID verification it's not about protecting kids lmao
Under the new law, the UK media regulator Ofcom is poised to label Wikipedia as a “Category 1” platform. This would impose the strictest content rules possible - such as: - age verification for users - identity verification for contributors - censorship of ‘harmful’ topics.
it’s not about porn. it’s about the fact that the government can pick and choose what they wish to ban and anything under “porn” and “sex” can fall under this category, including sexual health, reproduction rights, menstruation, lgbtq+ rights, etc, censorship is ALWAYS bad
Why are you upset that it's asking for you to verify your age?? Shouldn't we agree that children shouldn't be exposed to porn?
Respectfully, no. Any piece of law that is pass as "For the kids" has always been a scapegoat for another picture of control. Kids should be monitored by the parents and not a government of law or payment processor who have to much power.
"modern puritanism" and it's not giving porn to minors 🙄
grimsley is such an inherently funny character when you remember gen 5 is the gen that removed the game corner
drop your shitty job and join my shady business group
Corbeau don’t come outside, I just saw a Talonflame, stay safe short king
the firebreathing lesbian and her pathetic gay chihuahua
*sobs* I'm cringe😔
🎨 #pokemon WHERE ARE MY FELLOW NAVEEN ENJOYERS AT