petermshane a/k/a petermshane.bksy.social
@petermshane
Constitutional and admin law prof. Author, Democracy's Chief Executive (U. Cal. 2022). Podcast host @DemChiefExecPod. @Monthly contributor. Corgi-obsessed.
I had hoped that the info shared in our @demchiefexecpod series on Project 2025 would help make the series irrelevant after the election. Alas, they may now help in seeing what’s coming. Our earliest episodes on law and the presidency also urgent. open.spotify.com/show/59gIdLq8e…
“Trump’s use of executive power is not a distortion of the Roberts Court’s theory of the presidency; it is the Court’s theory of the presidency, brought to life.” My take in the Atlantic. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
"In 2025, however, no one in authority takes war powers originalism seriously. The remaining institutional constraint—politics—is, for now, not even a speed bump slowing a belligerent president." My take on what bombing Iran reveals about war powers. washingtonmonthly.com/2025/07/03/tru…
In a crossover episode of @demchiefexecpod, I go from host to guest. @LindsayLangholz, @acslaw Sr. Dir. of Policy & Program and host of the ACS podcast, Broken Law, asked about Trump’s independent agency firings and the shaky future of checks and balances. open.spotify.com/episode/0juJYH…
The Supreme Court’s combination of glib history and hubris continues to fuel an executive-indulgent constitutional jurisprudence at odds with both text and political reality.
Read @petermshane's explainer: washingtonmonthly.com/2025/06/04/ano…
Pleased to be quoted in this story on Trump's efforts to "deregulate" by ignoring the law. As usual, the novelty is in the scope of Trump's lawlessness. Anything others did occasionally, he will do systematically. "Obama jaywalked? Let's do armed robbery!" wapo.st/4dqIrDN
Attached is the letter signed by Ohio State Moritz College of Law faculty, in their individual capacities, in light of current threats to constitutional democracy and the rule of law in the U.S.


On 3/12 I debated Aditya Bamzai of UVA on, “Does the Law Provide for a Unitary Executive?” at Harvard. From 20:27 to 29:22, I argue originalism is unsound, text and history favor checks and balances, and a modest UET was bound to metastasize à la Trump. youtu.be/3NEpMm-wGWw?si…
If you’re wondering what unitary executive theory is, how an extreme version is enabling Trump, why constitutional text doesn’t align with it, and where we might be headed, here’s the link to my 3/10 conversation with Tom Gerety about the issues. youtu.be/ynEclhsYXbs?si…
Proud to be among 950+ law professors signing a letter organized by BC law prof @Kentgreenfield1 for @acslaw challenging the rampant illegality of the Trump Administration. A post at acslaw.org/press_release/… contains a link to the letter and its signatories.
If your copy of the Constitution is missing Article I, Section 8, cl. 18, a copy is available here: law.cornell.edu/constitution/a…
Congress funds and oversees the executive branch much like a Board of Directors. it does not dictate how the government operates.
The title of my essay published in The Atlantic is pretty much what I'd have thought to be a unanimous understanding of the Constitution: “Presidents May Not Unilaterally Dismantle Government Agencies.” Yet Trump's assault on checks and balances continues. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
I had the privilege yesterday of being interviewed by Mitch Jeserich for the Letters & Politics program on Pacifica's KPFA radio. We discussed the history of executive power as interpreted by the Supreme Court and how we got to the present moment. kpfa.org/program/letter…
Jordan Ascher of Governing for Impact and I explain in today's @monthly what's wrong with Trump's Schedule F scheme. As the subhead says: "It violates statutes, undoes a century of civil service reform, and would derail government services." washingtonmonthly.com/2025/02/10/tru…
I urge in @monthly that progressives opposed to the Trump-Musk regime's abuses now turn to courts with the same energy and creativity that Red States brought to bear against Biden. washingtonmonthly.com/2025/02/04/to-…. Many have started. Just Security has a tracker: justsecurity.org/107087/tracker…
I actually give them points for candor.
Putting aside the normative issues, speaking merely as a student of politics, the American right could really use a dash of rhetorical subtlety. You’re not “abolishing the administrative state,” you’re protecting it from those who would corrupt it. You’re not “purging” DOJ,…
Trump’s early moves aim to bring under his control the levers of power that the Constitution gives Congress to support its role as a co-equal branch of government. Madison had a word for the system Trump would erect: tyranny. My latest in @monthly washingtonmonthly.com/2025/01/30/tru…