keef
@leftysceptic
Dimmest person on twitter thinks that sex being a protected characteristic means members of a sex can’t ever be excluded from a single sex service designed for the opposite sex due to their sex
Under what circumstances does a service provider have the lawful right to exclude men from a space or service, despite sex being a protected characteristic?
Can someone please explain how JR’s questioning helps their defence? Surely she knows that “how” has no good answer here?
AG - sandies beliefs, there are other ways to raise it JR - how AG - other ways to raise it, we have to respect others and use NHS values. JR - who report to AG - manager, head of nursing, other line managers, common someone to call me and say AG can you talk this through w me
The way the tribunal resumes will be key, I think. NC can’t back down on this, if Judge decides it’s not appropriate to call him “him” then what next? What recourse if a judge doesn’t actually adhere to SC ruling?
Whoops!!
Detail amd he tells u of two more occasions including when SP withdrew from CR. It seems in this ix u still have seen complaint document. AG - yes NC - wasnt it obvious there was something u hadn't seen at this point AG - he, Beth gave me an account at the time
Jean Hatchet talking bollocks again
What a load of bullshit. Khoo made a choice and stood by a trans activist censoring women’s names. You backed her. She’s not an artistic saint being bullied for her art. Her art was used to bully women, she allowed it. I’ve asked you who the “bullies” are? thecritic.co.uk/against-the-ne…
The latest in the series of “I’m gonna be contrary and then wonder why I get pushback later”
Wrote for @unherd about the weird watchability of Masterchef, at the end of an era unherd.com/2025/07/ill-mi…
The answer is a third option. These people have adopted wholesale a definition of “female” that is entirely metaphysical, and by that definition, her answer is legitimate. That belief was hardened in “no debate” but is exposed when it meets reality
So Isla Bumba somehow doesn’t know if she is female but if Dr Beth Upton, a fully intact male says he is female then she accepts that as true??? These people have lost their minds or are being deliberately obtuse.
It’s not an argument that “ends up with” that. There’s simply no reasonable argument for the idea that a woman carries a pregnancy to term to then decide not to keep the baby at the time it causes most harm
Any position which ends up with "she must have had good reason" is a) completely unrealistic, flying in face of diverse human psychology/ criminal history and b) makes feminism look madly ideological and hypocritical.
Comments like this actually show that she does actually have a semblance of shame somewhere for the shite she puts her name to these days
PS Please read before going off (then by all means go off).