AnonyMassLawyer
@anonymasslawyer
Lawyer
For those interested, an audio/podcast version of my prior, and likely last, post (Yes, Karen Read Did It) open.substack.com/pub/anonymassl…
Probably my last post (and it’s a long one) open.substack.com/pub/anonymassl…
This will be the last scene, as she walks away from the courthouse…
Karen Read and Alan Jackson ink screen adaptation according to @THR hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/kar…
Still attacking family members of witnesses and still touting the 2:27 google search that didn’t happen and that the defense itself abandoned (because they couldn’t even get their hired gun IT expert to testify to it). Just the absolute worst human.
It's really sad to see what the McAlberts have done to the next generation of McAlberts. This is a comment on John's niece's Tik Tok post about the verdict. Her mother googled "hos long to die in cold" at 2:27 AM, lied to the FBI, called John as a "man lying in the snow" on the…
It’s amazing how many times this guy just admits that he intentionally gaslit his audience about HUGE things. And yet they continue to come back for more lies. I just don’t understand that dynamic.
Remember when Hank Brennan stood up in open court and said the federal investigation was closed? Closed, as in, the arrests you FKR conspiracy crowd have been obsessively waiting for are never coming. And remember how the blogger swore he knew it was still open? Yeah… he knew it…
What an absolute indictment of your judgment. He didn’t “report” a damn thing. He was fed a bunch of lies by KR and her lawyers, which he printed, leading to endless harassment of innocent witnesses. And none of that libelous idiocy has held up to any scrutiny. Literally none.
Without 🐢boy, does anyone know or care about the KR trial? His relentless reporting - in the face of repeatedly being told by law enforcement that he was wrong & there was “nothing to see here” - cracked this case wide open. That should not be lost in all of the reporting.
Well that explains why they didn’t allow the photos into evidence. Photos from years later showing something that is surely not blood but intended to look like blood to the jury. Not at all probative and highly prejudicial. John never went in the garage.
This is inside the garage of 34 Fairview Road. This aligns with the patterns on John Okeefes head laceration.
Some post-verdict thoughts open.substack.com/pub/anonymassl…
Goes to show how unpredictable juries can be. Much stronger prosecution this time around. Much clearer evidence of guilt. And 9 fewer jurors voting to convict. Will be interesting to hear whether most of them thought she was innocent or just had some lingering doubt about guilt.
Seems increasingly hard to believe that jury is only debating the OUI charge. There are only 3 pieces of evidence (blood test, surveillance footage, and Karen’s statements) that are even relevant to that charge, and they’re very straightforward.
Seems that either jury is deadlocked on OUI manslaughter (like in first trial) or deadlocked on a lesser included offense (OUI). The first jury question suggested it might be latter, but the failure to render a verdict today could indicate the former.
Not a big deal given everything else, but there’s an approximately 1000% chance Alan Jackson said this (as TB originally said) but that TB changed it to Karen at AJ’s request to avoid gag order violation. So he’s “correcting” something true to a lie.
Earlier in the hallway I saw Karen Read and I said "those are good questions," to which she replied "Uhhhh yea, you think." I quoted the wrong person in a previous tweet and like to correct myself when I make a mistake.
I called this…
If I were Brennan, I’d seriously consider playing this clip in my closing.
Brennan’s closing argument was very strong. Approximately 1000% more powerful than Lally’s in the first trial. And Lally ultimately convinced 9 jurors.
Jackson accusing the prosecution of fraud and demanding the truth while blatantly lying about 52 different things is next level shamelessness.
I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a more mendacious closing. Jackson has repeatedly and blatantly misstated facts and mischaracterized testimony. He’s arguing points that were definitively debunked and for which the defense offered zero counter evidence. Hope the jury can see that.
I cannot believe Jackson brought up the google search. The depths of dishonesty in the closing are astounding.
Where the trial stands heading into closing arguments open.substack.com/pub/anonymassl…