WikiBias
@WikiBias2024
Unveiling the Blind Spots: Where Wikipedia's 'Neutral Point of View' Policy Falls Short
Jerusalem has been at the heart of Jewish identity since biblical times. Yet, in Wikipedia’s alternate reality, it is not even part of Israel—disregarding historical and political facts.
Once Upon a Wiki Iran spins its Alibaba tales and lies 🧶 Wikipedia, the loyal minion, spreads them 👿
The Dinah Project reveals horrific details of the sexual atrocities committed by Hamas on October 7. Women were gang-raped, their genitals mutilated, and shot in the vagina, breasts, and face. Their naked bodies were burned, while Hamas perpetrators openly bragged about these…
The article on Hamas’s sexual violence on October 7 quotes their denial as if it were credible, equivalent to quoting Nazi denials as if they carry any weight. It now omits key evidence from the significant Dina Project, deliberately continuing to whitewash Hamas’s crimes.
Wikipedia acts as Hamas's spokesperson! Alleged assaults by Israeli soldiers are presented as facts. Documented mass sexual assaults by Hamas, per the Dina Project, are dismissed as "allegations." One page claims Israel's guilt on hearsay; another hides Hamas atrocities.
America is a strong ally of Israel, sharing its core values.🇺🇸🇮🇱 But what if Wikipedia's article on its capital were biased, like Jerusalem's? This AI-generated demo applies Wikipedia’s editorial framing of Jerusalem’s article to Washington, D.C., highlighting the bias.
Did a lack of ammunition end Israel's operation against Iran's nuclear capability? The IDF says no. Wikipedia, as usual, omits this, remaining one-sided.
Wikipedia's List of companies involved in the Gaza Strip article is biased, linking corporate involvement to civilian casualties and "potential war crimes" without legal basis, framing narrative before facts. It focuses only on Israel's suppliers, ignoring Hamas or other…
The "Iran-Israel war" was in fact a Israeli military operation. Wikipedia reports 24 Israeli civilian casualties but describes Iranian casualties as "women and children." This reflects factual inaccuracy regarding Israeli casualties and biased framing. #WikiPropaganda
OOPS, Wikipedia DID it Again! 😱😱 Wikipedia is now hosting yet another politically one-sided article, written almost entirely by a single biased author known for his anti-Israeli "contributions." The fact that the article MOCKS PEACE is important. It helps reveal the actual…
The Palestinians could have had their own country in 1948 if their leadership had chosen peace. Instead, they opted for violence, lies, and manipulation. 😭 It's shameful that Wikipedia promotes Hamas's lies and propaganda as if it were their spokesperson.😡
Three (!!) Wikipedia articles accuse Israel of genocide, ignoring its defense against Hamas, a terrorist group intent on its destruction, which launched a brutal massacre and could end the war by surrendering and releasing hostages. Yet the one article exposing Iran’s policy to…
Congratulations to Israel and the US for destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities and the upcoming ceasefire. Biases and misinformation about the operation will be closely examined in the coming days.
The good news about Wikipedia is that it’s totally replaceable. After Wikipedia's biased move to erase the key article Destruction of Israel in Iranian Policy, the entry is now back online and featured on @JustapediaF's front page. Truth prevails baby! 🌟 justapedia.org/wiki/Main_Page…
English Wikipedia is eradicating free thought. Today, it decided to delete the Destruction of Israel in Iranian policy page, merging it into Iran-Israel relations! 😱🚫 The platform's bias is screaming out loud. We can no longer ignore it! 😡🔥 #TruthMatters
The Iranian nuclear program section in the Iran–Israel war entry highlights Iran's claims of peaceful intent, portraying it as an innocent actor. At this rate, Wikipedia soon depict the wolf in Little Red Riding Hood as a misunderstood peace activist.
Ilan Pappé is a dubious academic who despises Israel, prioritizes ideology over facts, and often misuses or fabricates sources. No surprise he’s widely cited on Wikipedia’s propaganda machine, further eroding any claim to neutrality. Thanks @bandlersbanter for the insight.
