Cheshire

I have sought retroactive approval from my IRB for my PubPeer experiment on human subjects. I should hear back shortly, although one member is notoriously late.

I think he may have gone off the deep end, tweeting the same video more than a dozen times.

First time I’ve heard of a judge doing this. reason.com/volokh/2025/07…

This seems wrong. Can @Support help?

This guy is quite the troublemaker. retractionwatch.com/2025/07/23/mis…

Looks like the senior author passed away in 2023. Will someone else @BrownUniversity take responsibility for cleaning up these papers? pubpeer.com/search?q=jack+…

For some reason @SabinehazanMD think details like this don’t matter. Embarrassing that peer review works so poorly that this stuff gets published.

Consistently inconsistent. @SabinehazanMD shouts about transparency, but won't share her data or her documentation when asked, with predictable results. retractionwatch.com/2025/07/22/mic…

Oopsies. NIH-funded research courtesy of @BrownUniversity researchers and American Journal of Cancer Research. Multiple image issues. Seems an odd journal choice for NIH research. pubpeer.com/publications/7…

I continue to slowly make my way through a set of papers in American Journal of Cancer Research (Associate Editor-in-Chief @weldeiry). I've finished 5 years’ worth and it seems that on average 30% of these papers have concerning images.

Yay Lonni! 😸

Hopefully someone is still at the FDA who recognizes that the Journal of Clinical Trials is published by Longdom/OMICS International, which is widely recognized as a predatory publisher. See FTC lawsuit: ftc.gov/legal-library/…

Took almost 4 years for this to get retracted. The infamous Dunbar quote: "“The lag time might actually be to our advantage,” Dunbar wrote..." The image in the article seems to be based on the image I posted on PubPeer in October 2021. pubpeer.com/publications/F…

This is scary. I suspect we’ll be seeing more of this.

Today, @SabinehazanMD seems to be complaining that she can't experiment on a 5-year-old child. Am I reading this wrong?

This “Remarkable” results headline was based on a study published 2 1/2 years ago. Without even reading the study, I can tell @SciTechDaily1 is trying to make readers dumber. Did they get paid to promote this? I'd love to hear. scitechdaily.com/remarkable-res…

Philadelphia's mascot game, like the NY Post's front page, remains undefeated.

Funny argument between @SabinehazanMD and Elmo's AI. She doesn't like the fact that the AI rates her "trust" level as 30%, so she's "turning off her brain" 🧠 and suggesting that she may not "publish again." Dr. Hazan: Is that a threat or a promise? x.com/SabinehazanMD/…

Even Elmo’s AI tool thinks @SabinehazanMD should quit whining and share her data. But she won’t. That’s just one of the reasons some of her papers should be retracted.