Bemused Beaver
@ScheidlD
Interest in national security, history, and foreign policy. Sic Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
My two pieces with MLI. 1) laying out the need for Canadian grand strategy, and how the lack of one is preventing us from concentrating on our core interests: Canada’s grand strategic deficit: David Scheidl for Inside Policy | Macdonald-Laurier Institute (macdonaldlaurier.ca)
Admirably clear about geopolitical reality. Canada's geography and commercial tightness with the US constrains any real pivot we would care to make. Yet, as the author notes, this need not be a net strategic negative for Canada. Canada yet retains the ability to make this work.
Happy #CanadaDay2025 My latest w/ @japantimes #canada's #middlepower myths give way to harsh realities japantimes.co.jp/commentary/202… @MLInstitute @AsiaPacificFdn @CDAInstitute @EASCentre @Canada_China @KAS_Canada @CanadaWestFdn @Canada @APInitiative_en @stevenchase @globeandmail
Really interesting discussion today on @schoolofwarpod with @WillSomUSA. We discuss what it takes to make munitions in America in 2025. podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/ep-…
Really loving this approach to containing China of tariffing our best regional allies into a recession, while simultaneously demanding that they increase their defense expenditures.
Japan exports fall for a second straight month, driven by a sharp decline in auto shipments to the U.S.
Quite so. Present frictions with the USA remain solvable. The threat from the PRC is not, absent a concerted campaign to root out their influence from Cdn politics and society, and ensure Canada is no longer a permissive environment for PRC intimidation and influence campaigns
I'm highly disinclined to this argument but if you were to convince me and other Canadians presumably you'd directly address the tradeoffs. There's nothing here about CCP's geopolitical and security aggression or its domestic authoritarianism or even its fundamental role in the…
The Sino-Russian alliance—buttressed by North Korea and Iran—is consolidating. One more reason the current talk in Washington about disaggregating the Atlantic and the Pacific theaters makes no geostrategic sense. In reality, the adversary gets a vote. asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Ukrai…
"The act of writing the thing is the same thing as the thinking of it. If you can’t write it, you haven’t actually thought it.” Read, study, contemplate, posit, detail, explain, speak, pursue, rebut, advance, and then rise from just a person or politician to the level of a…
It was my honor to give the keynote address at a dinner last week for the amazing @HudsonInstitute Political Studies Program. I warned the students that AI was first going to destroy them, and then America. AI and education seem topical this weekend, so I thought I'd just post my…
The red flag here, as highlighted in the Clingendael report, is that if Hutchison Port Holdings is considered a Chinese company, then 73.3% of Rotterdam's deepsea container terminal activity is owned by Chinese entities. And it isn’t just Rotterdam but ports all across Europe…
Excellent piece. Strategic depth an important concept to understand in modern context. Plenty that can be done to shape the prospective battlefield in advance, and robust strategic depth could contribute to deterring a major war. Useful concept for middle powers (🇨🇦🇦🇺🇵🇱🇬🇧🇯🇵)too!
One of my favorite writers, @HudsonInstitute's Nadia Schadlow, in one of my favorite publications, @EngelsbergIdeas. Happy Monday! engelsbergideas.com/notebook/the-i…
Signal to noise ratio is a critical spec for NVGs. It affects how grainy the image is. The Army has set a legit req to give soldiers world-class kit. One of the reasons the CAF gets screwed so often is our system is so vulnerable to this emotional manipulation by failed bidders.
Ottawa is set to award a major defence contract for night-vision binoculars despite industry concerns that its requirements are written in a way that all but assures a single U.S. company is eligible. cbc.ca/news/politics/…
Finland's preparation for war: “All our operational centres have 30 metres of granite on top of them. Russia can drop a nuclear bomb, and you would notice it but survive. We have bomb shelters for 4.4mn people. All our fighter jets are under 30m of granite too.” "Finland is also…
Imperial Japan did far less to help Nazi Germany against the Soviets than than what China, Russia, and North Korea have provided to Iran. Does that mean that the World War II Axis did not actually count as an axis? What does "axis" even mean if the original Axis wasn't an axis?
1/ Good to see the idea of an "axis" between China-Russia-Iran-North Korea come up for long overdue scrutiny. These four countries share antipathy toward US and have revisionist aims, but they do not operate as a cohesive axis. Kudos to @ewong. (1 of 3) nytimes.com/2025/07/06/us/…
The problem is that there are no consequences for failing to meet NATO's capability targets. By disclosing them publicly, there would be greater domestic and international pressure on laggards.
🎯 “Nato should allow countries to say what military capabilities they are lacking to help them win public support for higher levels of defence spending.” on.ft.com/3HUmzoE
We should think of drones today like jet aircraft in the 1950s, when engineers hoped they'd design something dominant for a few years and would settle for relevant for the same span. Some exceptions may be used for decades. But expecting any specific one to is a fool's game.
Well said. Plentiful opportunities abound for Canada to establish itself as a genuinely respected power in its own right, nested within a stronger, more capable, and more self sufficient West
"A #Canada spending 5% of its GDP on defence & loaded with natural resources will be a formidable power in its own right," writes Alexander Dalziel. "European leaders have not missed this realization." macdonaldlaurier.ca/canadas-new-tr…
A weaker Iran, less able to support Russias war is in the interest of broader West. Hopefully this does result in an abandonment of its nuclear program. Credible deterrence means both material and willpower capacity, which US has now demonstrated that it will act. Hopeful sign.
"The United States, by committing its own strategic assets to destroy critical Iranian military infrastructure, has gained the initiative in what could be seen as the first true strategic victory for the West in World War III—a long, undeclared conflict characterized by economic…
Stayed up late with @Doranimated to break down the strikes and their likely consequences on @schoolofwarpod: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/ep-…
NEW: Adversary Entente Task Force Update, June 18, 2025 | Key Takeaways + Full Report⬇️(1/2) Russia offers to mediate Israel-Iran talks: Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to mediate Iran-Israeli talks following the onset of the Iran-Israeli war on June 13. Neither Iran,…
NEW: Adversary Entente Task Force Update, June 11, 2025 | Key Takeaways + Full Report⬇️(1/2) Iranian Nuclear Negotiations: Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to facilitate the United States-Iran nuclear negotiations. Putin’s offer comes as the nuclear negotiations are at…
I'm just begging people to consider that a "multipolar" world order will see *more* of these kinds of wars not fewer
Indeed. Plausible there is a major war this decade. And always a lag btwn defence dollars being injected and usable capability acquired. Ditto on expanding defence industry. A real sense of urgency needed to develop a war ready military...
We may not have five years. Reality may insist on a schedule other than the one the CAF deems manageable.
Strongly concur. The world into which we are entering is one of fraught geopolitical competition against a number of hostile adversaries that primarily respect strength. De-escalation and compromise have their place in statecraft, but only from a position of strength.
Rudyard Griffiths and @Sean_Speer: The dangerous seduction of ‘de-escalation’ in Western foreign policy FREE 3-month Hub subscription: thehub.ca/free-trial/ Full article here: thehub.ca/2025/06/17/rud…