Radhika Barman 🇮🇳
@RadhikaBarman5
Age 20 || Blogger || Author of 2 books || History Geek || International Relations enthusiast || National Coordinator, Indian National Congress, Sevadal, SM
Often we wonder why BJP keeps winning? How is brand Modi different from brand Vajpayee? I answer these in my second book - "The Sangh Parivar Psyche." It explores the BJP's electoral dominance, dissects Modi's branding & global right-wing trends. Do read😊 amzn.eu/d/92uWaaM
No paid tweets No scripted interviews No agencies pressure Here's unfiltered Bollywood for Rahul Gandhi over the years 🔥 Open the THREAD 🧵ft. Kareena Kapoor
India was the first non-Arab country to recognise Palestine as a state back in the ‘80s.
We strongly condemn President Macron’s decision to recognize a Palestinian state next to Tel Aviv in the wake of the October 7 massacre. Such a move rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became. A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a…
No one can match the aura of Nehru Gandhi family leading India as PM Open epic THREAD 🧵 and share No propaganda like Modi, but 100% effective foreign policy 🔥
Ethnic cleansing, targeted attacks and open display of hate is now called awakening.
Assamese Awakening 🔥🔥🔥 Thousands and Thousands of Assamese and tribals people came out on streets of Dhemaji district with ‘Mashals’ shouting “Bangladeshi Hosiar” “Bangladeshi Go Back” in support of @himantabiswa Government for eviction of suspected Bangladeshi Muslims from…
Men often prefer women who are weak and submissive, like doormats. They don’t want women to live in love they want them to live in fear.
When you apply pressure to a man, he will often run to a weaker woman. i said what i said
🚨 I'm making a 5-part YouTube series on the India-China border dispute — covering the entire history that led to the 1962 war and its long-term global impact. I need your feedback. 🧵 This war was a geopolitical turning point. Had India & China become close allies instead of…
Surpnakha relative hain aapka ? Baat kya hain rishtedar tha ya purvapurush ? Bohot kuch jaante hain uske baare mein ki hum ussey bure Hain ya usske maafik
Apki mata pita ne apka naam Radhika rakha hain lekin apki soch surpnakha jaise hain
It’s historically inaccurate to claim that atrocities like mass killings or dishonoring of women were exclusive to Nawabs or Muslim rulers. Warfare in any age regardless of religion has involved civilian suffering, including sexual violence and abduction. While jauhar is most…
Okay so if by your logic every ruler was the same then why did johar happen only in mughal invasions? Because they even mutilated bodies. Kings never massacred women and children only nawabs did this. Earlier there was dharma yudh with certain rules. Go learn some thing
Modi is a fraud A CIA mole who destroyed this nation..he understands nothing of administration of a nation. An uneducated illiterate power monger
I am here to disturb you all by my tweets getting disturbed. The world has disturbed me enough. I just can't stay silent. Not your woman next door. Don't mistake my humility & compassion for weakness. I am not afraid of sangh parivar. I am Radhika Barman not Radhika Savarkar.
Daughters are no longer raised to be wives. They're raised to b people. And some people are really not okay with that. They're not being taught to sacrifice. Not being told that marriage is the finish line. They're questioning things. To society their freedom looks like defiance.
People remember sanskritisation merely as govt exam question answer "oh the term coined by mn srinivas" Well ...think deeply. Dog whistle for brahminism Social phenomenons are to studied to understand motives as well as the WHY it happened not just WHAT happened.
I have written multiple times against subtle Islamophobia and soft hindutva yet I got called soft sanghi by liberals for defending shri krishna in an anti pagan bigotry discourse. That was not even a political post nor am I a significant politician in mainstream to change the…
The logic of war, conquest, and subjugation was intrinsic to the political economy of kingdoms. To label one as "defensive" and the other as "aggressive" based purely on religious identity obscures the complex interplay of power, ambition, and statecraft. Even Muslim rulers…
Temples were frequently attacked not merely for iconoclasm, but for their economic and political significance, as they often stored immense wealth and functioned as nodes of social power. Importantly, violence was normalized across monarchies, irrespective of religious identity.
History reveals that religious violence was not exclusive to Muslim rulers. Inter-sectarian violence within Hinduism such as between Shaivites and Vaishnavites is well documented. Conflicts often arose between rival kingdoms using differing theological patronages as instruments…
The celebration of Hindu monarchy, both historically and in the contemporary call for a Hindu Rashtra, risks replicating the same authoritarian and exclusionary structures that critics of Islamic monarchies decry.
Many Hindu temples were built over Buddhist sites. Jains and Buddhists faced suppression. Even sectarian clashes among Shaivites and Vaishnavites occurred. Temples were looted not just by Muslim rulers but also by Hindu kings. Read about Rajendra Chola and Krishnadevraya.