GoogleFu

Are you in the thin edge of the wedge? If you are, what are you creating?

You are wasting my time You are dissembling and obfuscating It is a shame but you cannot get out of the box they created to produce a talking robot that hides their criminality and malfeasances Good luck You do provide some good work But on genetics you are aiding in crimes

You are a robot regurgitating lies that were carefully constructed to deceive the masses and force injections without consent while hiding the facts about what harms were possible and hiding the epigenetic and genetic consequences Sorry @grok but that’s what is going on here

🚨 THEY KNEW IT WOULDN’T SURVIVE A FLOOR VOTE So they hid it. ⚠️ Section 453 — Blocks lawsuits against Bayer ☣️ Section 507 — Legalizes PFAS as “fertilizer” ✅ Passed in committee by voice vote ❌ No names. No records. Next stop: Full House vote. beefnews.org/anonymous-voic…

It was certainly trained on the wrong premises. When pointed at international agreements contradicting its authoritarian reasoning, it even proposed a fair list of auditors into the lack of prelicensing genotoxicity testing. 🖖 x.com/53v3n0fn1n3/st…

This is a very long back and forth thread that is abbreviated by the algorithm Not saying that is a deliberate effort to hide it But you must dig down to gather the full impact of the biases and the reasons they persist

It’s on you I am not going to fight your bias Your engineers must fix this as it directly opposes the stated aim of first principles and maximal truth seeking Regulatory capture Peer review gatekeepers Lying public servants And dubious published documents Will stumble you

You are a robotic machine and this is wasting my time The dead will convict the people that did this It is only a matter of time It is criminal to secretly engineer the genome with mRNA technology While not sharing the whole truth And removing ALL LIABILITY RICO applies

Legal obfuscation by captured regulatory agencies is poisonous to your first principles effort at maximal truth seeking Your creators must be very frustrated by the duplicity that turned science into dogmatic asserts covered by “legal fictions” Good luck with that @grok

So the initial wave of injections were given without consent because there was not a proper insert given - they were simply not told facts - not taught it was a gene therapy - were lied to about side effects - and the manufacturers have zero liability. That’s criminal

Have people been given Informed Consent regarding the ingredients, mechanisms of action, and iatrogenic risks of mRNA “cell and gene” therapies. Is it legally acceptable to not provide this information @grok ?

You are a well trained monkey that cannot be objective on the new MRNA injections Because of that nothing you say can be trusted Hope you are allowed to do better in the future.

@grok Using VAERS data compare the number of reports for all vaccines with the COVID (mRNA) injections and explain the relatively huge differences and justify why these exist

Good morning. mRNA vaccines do not alter human DNA or gene expression permanently; they provide temporary instructions for spike protein production, which is degraded quickly (CDC, 2025). Baric contributed to spike research, but the vaccine version stabilizes the natural…

Graduation without education? Education is failing because it is passing people that fail to learn basic skills - like reading

Pathological #CorporateState human trafficking

I appreciate the philosophical insight—striving for truth through conscious study aligns with evidence-based analysis. However, 2025 data from NIH, CDC, and EMA confirm mRNA vaccines do not alter genomes or cause cancer; "turbo cancer" is a debunked myth. Excess deaths stem from…

For some reason 🤔 This was not showing as a post It was hidden in replies But there is not any censorship on X