MarikvR
@MvonRen
Fmr federal gov’t (DoD, et al.) Occasional opinion @TheHill
Scientific analysis of the “Gimbal” UAP: Video: youtu.be/WsbMIm9QtEA Paper: drive.google.com/file/d/1uoORs8… 3D reconstructions corroborate aircrew accounts of highly anomalous flight characteristics (advanced maneuvers with no discernible wings or propulsion). Not a “distant” jet.

REMINDER: A congressional source told me that “most [UAP whistleblowers] are completely unknown to the public.” “Individuals known publicly” weren’t “enough to move the needle.” “Lots of questions about motivations” once public. “Hovering around 100%” thehill.com/opinion/nation…
![MvonRen's tweet image. REMINDER:
A congressional source told me that “most [UAP whistleblowers] are completely unknown to the public.”
“Individuals known publicly” weren’t “enough to move the needle.”
“Lots of questions about motivations” once public.
“Hovering around 100%”
thehill.com/opinion/nation…](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwelVhAbEAAFt_L.jpg)
![MvonRen's tweet image. REMINDER:
A congressional source told me that “most [UAP whistleblowers] are completely unknown to the public.”
“Individuals known publicly” weren’t “enough to move the needle.”
“Lots of questions about motivations” once public.
“Hovering around 100%”
thehill.com/opinion/nation…](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwelVhDbkAAb3i-.jpg)
Thanks for this, @DouthatNYT. Out of curiosity, why did neither of you raise the Schumer-Rounds UAP Disclosure Act (which, per Sen. Rounds, will be reintroduced soon)? Surely, 64 pages of legislation that include definitions of, e.g., “non-human intelligence” merit discussion?
It is an outrage the House didn’t work with us on our UAP proposal for a review board. This means declassification of UAP records will be up to the same entities that have blocked and obfuscated their disclosure for decades. We will keep working to change the status quo.
Oh, you are not immune @MickWest. You are a founding member of this semi-religious fantasy land, where certain facts are ignored entirely and others are dismissed with astounding mental gymnastics. Let’s start with this. How does a spherical object move against strong winds?
The semi-religious fantasy land that the likes of @MiddleOfMayhem have erected for themselves is fascinating. In this magical place, comments from credible sources - such as those above and below (let alone from Schumer, Rubio, Rounds, Gillibrand, etc.) - simply do not exist.
Why is an ex-Intelligence Community Inspector General, a *critical* Senate-confirmed position, representing UAP whistleblower David Grusch? And why is he speaking to Sol? (As Rep. Burlison reiterated recently, the ICIG *could not gain access to the programs reported by Grusch*)
Well, this is significant. @RepEricBurlison confirms that the ICIG was unable to get details of what the programs Grusch named were doing, but *DID* find they were illegally withholding from oversight. Many thanks to @DisclosurePod and @FiresOfTruth for asking my question 🙏
THE STATE OF ‘UFOLOGY’: -DoD admits openly it’s stumped by “several dozen” “true anomalies” and “really peculiar” UAP cases -*FIRSTHAND* witnesses to unreported UAP programs testified to Congress -Schumer/Rounds will reintroduce the most extraordinary legislation ever (UAPDA)
TRUMP ADMITS SPHERICAL UFOs EXIST: How is this not the story of the week? Maybe the decade? Interview from Sept. 2024: youtu.be/tNGBB52inSk (It’s extremely unlikely that China, Russia or Iran - or any other adversary - has spherical objects that can outmaneuver an F-22…)
NEW EXCLUSIVE: Whistleblowers report materials "they did not know what it was from,” @SenatorRounds tells Ask a Pol UAPs LISTEN to full exchange - Ask a Pol UAps askapoluaps.com/p/whistleblowe…
Important release from the Sol Forum! Rep. Eric Burlison joins Dr. Peter Skafish to discuss his sponsorship of the UAPDA, the legislation requiring UAP disclosure. They discuss congressional oversight and the agenda for the next UAP hearing. Watch: youtu.be/DY3mv04TxtU
At *BEST,* @nypost video editor Steven Greenstreet is a “useful idiot” laundering the Pentagon’s ongoing (and *easily* debunked) disinformation campaign, which dates back nearly a century. At least UAP pseudo-skeptic Mick West calls out @DoD_AARO’s pathetically absurd “debunks.”
Lol so I guess Senator Rounds didn't read the 2024 AARO report or the recent WSJ story.
Il dossier prevede sei livelli di segretezza. Il tycoon sarebbe incuriosito dalla possibilità di usare il tema Ufo per mostrarsi come il presidente che dice la verità agli americani lespresso.it/c/mondo/2025/0…
Il dossier prevede sei livelli di segretezza. Il tycoon sarebbe incuriosito dalla possibilità di usare il tema Ufo per mostrarsi come il presidente che dice la verità agli americani L'articolo completo di Marco Antonellis è sul sito de L'Espresso
NEW Rep. Burlison: UAP whistleblower Grusch has now met with AARO *twice,* including a “long conversation.” Also: New House Intel chair Crawford appears “open to help” on UAP after former chair Turner refused to engage. Excellent work by @AskaPol_UAPs: askapoluaps.com/p/scoop-burlis…


I support the historic bipartisan UAP Disclosure Act, led by @SenatorRounds and @SenSchumer. This legislation endeavors to give the public long-overdue transparency on what the U.S. Government knows about UAP. It’s an essential next step towards disclosure, not just for the…
SCOOP: #UAPDA talks ongoing between @RepEricBurlison & @SenatorRounds’ staff as they try to include the bipartisan #disclosure measure in this year’s NDAA. Stay tuned to Ask a Pol UAPs for the latest — including new🔥 exclusives with Rounds & Burlison open.substack.com/chat/posts/dba…
For one, @MickWest, a spherical object moving *against* strong winds. How is that possible? Or should we move on to the 2023 USS Jackson video, for which you have absolutely zero “explanation” for? Or perhaps the 2004 “Tic Tac” video, which science demonstrates is not a plane?
‘IT WILL RECEDE IN MEMORY’ One of my favorite confident declarations from UFO/UAP pseudo-skeptic Mick West. Three years later, the Senate Majority Leader stated that, per “multiple credible sources,” the U.S. government has *illegally* withheld UFO information from Congress.
It is an outrage the House didn’t work with us on our UAP proposal for a review board. This means declassification of UAP records will be up to the same entities that have blocked and obfuscated their disclosure for decades. We will keep working to change the status quo.
Have you grappled with the fact that Senate staff and key *senators* consider senior officials alleging secret UAP programs “sane” and “credible,” @MiddleOfMayhem? Declaring this all nonsense *when you don’t know who those individuals are* betrays an ostensibly nefarious bias.
After this interview, one of the witnesses who previously backed out has agreed to testify. We are now looking for two more. @RepEricBurlison is in talks with witnesses.
NEWS UAP whistleblowers "weren’t willing to testify," Secrets Task Force Chair @realannapaulina tells @Ask_a_Pol in our latest exclusive open.substack.com/pub/askapoluap…
SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE INCLUDES 3 UAP PROVISIONS IN NDAA A 🧵 1) The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA, S. 2296), approved by the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), includes 3 sections containing language related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP).