shankar.j
@JoraShankara
Vishnu Tattva Nirnaya next verses - understanding नैषा तर्केण मतिरापनेया प्रोक्ताऽन्येनैव सुज्ञानाय प्रेष्ठ ' इति कठश्रुतिः । He is not known using only logic, nor through only intellect. Why not? Ultimately logic and intellect are human capabilities, we are kshara jiva...
Vishnu Tattva Nirnaya one verse a day: Verse 1: सदागमैकविज्ञेयं समतीतक्षराक्षरम् । नारायणं सदा वन्दे निर्दोषाशेषसद्गुणम् ॥ The only one who has known from all sada-agamas The one who is beyond kshara and akshara ...
"Truth can be known by negating non truths" "Non-truths can be removed by knowing and keeping only whats true" Circular definition
I don't claim what I say is more truer than anything else. Truth can be known by negating non truths. I invited you to that. There is no thinker. Thinker is another thought. There is nothing to gain or lose. Things will unfold naturally.
26-07-2025 ಶ್ರಾವಣ ಮಾಸದ ಹಾಗೂ ಚಾತುಮಾಸ್ಯ ಪ್ರಯುಕ್ತ ಶ್ರೀ ಕ್ಷೇತ್ರ ತೊರವಿ ಶ್ರೀ ಲಕ್ಷ್ಮೀ ನರಸಿಂಹ ಸ್ವಾಮಿಗೆ ಇಂದಿನ ವಿಶೇಷ ಅಲಂಕಾರ ಪೂಜೆ
You can purchase from Amazon: amzn.eu/d/1NXAfRU
Received with thanks: Srimadacharya's Tattva Viveka with English Translation and English commentary, thanks to the dedicated team at Tara Prakashana @ProfPRMukund! Let's take a look at what scholars have said about this series in the subsequent tweets!
Nannu ma chelli ardham cheskunattu evaru ardham cheskoleru.. rakhi ki Nenu gift ivvali aithe thane naku return gift isthundhi 🥹❤️ Hari vAyu always bless her, please don't give her any hardships in life instead give it to me🙏🏻
Acharya warns about this
Shri Ram was a human being. This is historical fact as per Valmiki Ramayana. Any thing other than that is a story, that can great story to learn. No subtle manner is needed. Valmiki Ramayana clearly mentioned Rama as Nara, meaning human being.
"There is only question. No questioner separate from it. Questioner is an additional superimposition that is being done and this is false." Who is asking the question and why is he not talking in simple language?
There is only question. No questioner separate from it. Questioner is an additional superimposition that is being done and this is false. Actions appear to happen but there is no actor. The actor is denied. There is denial but no denier of this too. Bhagavad Gita supports this.
What? This was exactly one of the argument used by other schools. Self negation is not desirable in a framework Why would you boldly claim it?
Mithyavada is the only honest system that negates all systems and ITSELF. This is the way of Upanishads. Neti Neti. Not this not this. Like using a thorn to remove another and then discarding both or the stick that is used to lit fire pit is then consumed in the same fire.
Vedokta controversy and Lokmanya Tilak's take over it (Marathi-Hindi) youtu.be/3i95SSV-jJg?si…
If you use the term “source” as a name for God, in that loopy New Age way, I immediately disregard everything you say.
If nothing is real, there's no karma, no prarbhda, no rebirth. That's the reason why even kevala adviata has concept of vyavyarika satya (empirical reality) Below is wrong because it falsifies the foundations of Vedanta:
Karma is 100% "real" in this illusionary Universe (Maya) we consider in our experience as "real." First, the experience or experiencer is only real. Like your consciousness cooking up a dream where you, all of whom you meet, and the world you experience are unreal. If you…
Selfie with Kanchipuram Devaperumal sannidhi Madhvacharyar and Vyasar
“Vitarka badhane pratipaksha bhavanam’’ (II Sutra 33) - Rishi Patanjali Vitarka = improper thoughts Badhane = troubling Pratipaksha = opposite Bhavanam = side. “When improper thoughts trouble you, invoke the opposite side.” Long arc of Neurosciences bends towards Yogasutra
Cognitive Neuroscience Therapist shows how you can rewire your brain through Neuroplasticity (science backed)
Sri Madhvacharya: Why only one? Ask me a hundred questions, and I'll answer them.