ItsBS

SPACETIME begins exactly at this spot! The flaw in the SPACETIME concept is plainly evident right here! It is the flaw of SYMMETRY versus ASYMMETRY! 👇👇 Einstein's fantasy physics hinges on the principle depicted in his Spherical Wave Proof. Here is a straightforward animation…

Two easy "particles" in this model to investigate are the "photon" and "electron." Neither of these "particle models" matches experiments. The "photon" of Einstein's photoelectric effect misused Planck's e=hv math and doesn't account for "resonance" in Millikan's research.…

1=2 Fantasy Physics of Einstein 👈 This small statement packs in a lot of data, and if you can explain its meaning, then you have mastered the first 3 sections of Einstein 1905 Special Relativity paper! That's all you really need to know about Einstein's silly pseudoscience.

Re: "There is no reference frame "encapsulated in air", because that would be an absolute reference frame, which would break the classical principle of relativity." That is my point...it is a flawed concept. It doesn't consider the effect of the air medium. Re: "uniform motion…

Re: "special relativity has been shown to be in remarkable agreement with quantum mechanics" Do you realize that your statement REALLY means, Woldemar Voigt's Doppler transforms are in agreement with Schrodinger's Wave Mechanics, which both use the preferred reference frame of…

"empty space" - is a false concept by Einstein in his 1905 paper that gets the particle ideas started. Einstein stole Voigt's ideas without citation. He removed Voigt's medium/Doppler effect from the math and failed to re-derive Voigt's transforms without conflicting his own…

No. Schrodinger's Wave Mechanics is why we have SOME idea of what might be going on under the hood, but it is ignored by pseudoscientists that BELIEVE they understand atoms.

Lol @ you people arguing over ad-hoc pseudoscience. Why does everyone ignore what Schrodinger wrote? Why does everyone ignore how Schrodinger derived the math everyone seems to believe in?

Yes, the book where he contradicts his own Special Relativity by reclaiming light would not propagate through space without the luminiferous ether... Einstein is one big counter-intuitive, logical contradiction, paradoxical mess.

Because Einstein knew that he stole Voigt's work and that the speed of light "frame independence" was based on the Doppler Effect through the medium and was NOT about the velocity-based drag of the medium.

If "Quantum Physics" was true, then the Quantum Computer would be working...but it ain't, why? Because Quantum Mechanics is pseudoscience. They stole the math from Schrodinger's Wave Mechanics and applied their own belief system that you call a "wavefunction interpretation."

Bastards.

Oh no. @elonmusk is using Einstein SPACETIME lingo. Is he cooked?

Physicists lose their common sense and logic, which allows them to believe in fantasy physics. Physicists say really dumb shit like... "It's just counter-intuitive. The universe doesn't have to make sense to you." Computer science/engineers must make shit work using logic!

Ummo space brothers tell us: The "free electron" does not exist, like we think it does. Energy is quantized, i.e. Planck's Blackbody radiation experiment discovered the minimum amplitude of electromagnetic induction. But, the smallest length is about 12 femtometers. 👈

Great new Skinny Bob video enhancement:

Sabine @skdh, here is another physics misconception to add to the list! Michelson-Morely, null result & Einstein SR:

Grok 4 referenced a paper from 1984 that showed Voigt's transforms accurately predict the null result from Michelson-Morely experiment. jamespaulwesley.org/Document_Files… This is a big deal because Voigt used a PREFERRED REFERENCE FRAME (ether) and many argue the MM experiment proves…