Robert Kogon (former "Esprit de Voltaire")

WAR IS PEACE FREEDOM IS SLAVERY IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH CENSORSHIP IS FREE SPEECH (Updated version of *1984*, aka 2023 on Twitter)

2/ You know and I know, the authorization should just be pulled. Period. The Twitter-approved discussion has become so scholastic. The discussion of the exactly right "evidence-based" cutoff is the public health equivalent of how many angels can fit on the head of a pin.

I don't know about "Pfizer documents". I'm seeing BioNTech identified as sponsor in almost all of these docs. Why does no one even mention the German company? Very important to have obtained these docs. But as with full authorization, Pfizer is agent not principal.

The proposition concerns mandatory flu shots for health care workers. AFAIK, the connection to Covid vaccination is only in Florian Philippot's head. He makes the connection to Moderna's trialed "combo" shot. Why flog fake news? If I'm wrong, show me the evidence.

This is just the post-Brexit UK yet again copying the EU. If you are not careful, you will have a law. In the EU, it's called the Nature Restoration Law. That's Greta Thunberg 👇giving the finger to farmers who opposed it. tinyurl.com/8eswrzby

"Blacklisted topic"? Freedom of speech is not freedom of reach! I got to say it, so I should consider myself fortunate.

1/ As far as we know, Abdulmohsen was not an Islamic extremist but a Muslim apostate and *anti*-Islamist. He gave an interview in English denouncing what he perceived as Germany’s complicity with Islamism just 1 week before the incident.

2/2 It makes no sense that an anti-Islamist would attack a Xmas market. To pretend this incredibly murky case is clear is dishonest and not journalism.

If the DSA is only going to start affecting online speech NOW, then what have been writing about for the last 4 years? It's been in force for years already and it began impacting online speech even before it came into force.

The problem is what IS "illegal" content. EU countries have all sorts of laws restricting speech in ways that would be unthinkable in the States. In Germany, "insults" are illegal. Such restrictions are precisely ILLEGAL, i.e. unconstitutional, in the States.

Meloni's party just REFUSED to participate in an effort to have Ursula von der Leyen removed from office. Meloni *supports* VDL. It is madness to treat her as emblematic of a "shift" in EU politics. This is just marketing for Americans.

Excellent article. But not "could restrict": IS RESTRICTING. The Digital Services Act has been in force for 2 years now. tinyurl.com/4pe7b5jn

1/ How can you use the silly Sergeant Schultz meme and not even say that it was not Pfizer's trial anyway, but Pfizer conducted it on behalf of the GERMAN company BioNTech? It's a German company supported by the German govt. Do you hide this on purpose? tinyurl.com/26f9ch3p

1/ Huh, what is the point of rejecting the amendments when the US is leaving the WHO anyway? It's pure grandstanding. The amendments will go through and they will be there if and when, say the next admin brings the US back into the WHO. tinyurl.com/4j99ybx6

1/ But Trump is withdrawing the US from the WHO altogether, so this is essentially just grandstanding on RFK's part. He's very good at that. But let's face it, apart from empty gestures, he has not done much... tinyurl.com/4j99ybx6

Important. But the Daily Mail still hasn't discovered that it's NOT Pfizer's jab, but the German company BioNTech's. Pfizer is a contract manufacturer. As long as BioNTech gets the "credit" and Pfizer the blame, we'll never have justice. tinyurl.com/26f9ch3p

And the PEI has a longstanding quasi-commercial relationship with BioNTech, the very company whose product it was supposed to be "regulating" in this case!👇"Independent" my ass. tinyurl.com/3bsru99m

3/3 And the fact of the matter is that Vinay Prasad himself encouraged young people to get "at least one" dose, but of Pfizer-BioNTech not Moderna. That was his "opposition" and that's why he is where he is today.

1/ Per the CDC's own data (which no one ever talks about anymore), C19 vaccination increases the risk of myocarditis among males 18-24 roughly 30x. And the CDC analysts admit that's an underestimate. Why on earth is it still "recommended" for them?

It is useless and I already know the answer. But why does the virtual entirety if the "Medical Freedom Movement" act like the FDA only just acknowledged the myocarditis risk when it already did in 2021? Nobody can truly be satisfied with fake "wins".