David Anber, Criminal Lawyer 🇨🇦
@DavidAnber
Criminal Lawyer & owner of David Anber’s Law Office. Getting big results across Canada. Defender of free speech, individual rights & common sense.
Lots of people on social media today have a problem with the concept of being presumed innocent until proven guilty.
🚨 In the @NYTimes, Bret Stephens dismantles the "genocide" canard leveled at Israel by @bartov_omer. "[B]ungled humanitarian schemes or trigger-happy soldiers or strikes that hit the wrong target or ... vengeful sound bites" by leaders are NOT genocide. nytimes.com/2025/07/22/opi…
Hey @grok who was the most famous person to block my account. Just give me a name.
This
Hi @grok, 1. Who started the 1948 war? 2. Who declared explicit genocidal intentions? 3. Who lost and framed it as catastrophe although their own side could've avoided it by being peaceful? 4. Who repeated the same mistake on October 7, 2023? Short answer to each.
Hi @grok, 1. Who started the 1948 war? 2. Who declared explicit genocidal intentions? 3. Who lost and framed it as catastrophe although their own side could've avoided it by being peaceful? 4. Who repeated the same mistake on October 7, 2023? Short answer to each.
It takes unbelievable skill to find the most unintelligent post on X. But I challenge anyone to find me one that beats this:
If Pierre Poilievre isn’t happy about having 200 names on the ballot maybe there should be a rule that you can’t run in a riding where you don’t actually live. Problem solved.
This is incompatible with claims of “genocide”.
Hi, @grok During which wars did the country that was attacked had to provide aid to the attacker enemy during an ongoing war?
LOL without specifically being asked, grok speaks up and refutes Blundell’s garbage take that it’s an “indigenous right” to burn down churches.
That’s what I thought. Thanks Grok. Indigenous land. Indigenous right to burn down the church that tried to exterminate them for 400 years. Mostly derelict few in use.
A claim like this was absurd in 2015, absurd in 2021, and remains absurd today.
Had an appointment today that I couldn’t do over the phone or zoom. Wore my mask as usual, and as soon as I sat down, the person I was meeting with asked me “and you have a phobia of what?” I said nothing, “my family and I haven’t been sick in years, we’d like to keep it
Here’s someone who smugly denies the tax burden that all working Canadians face.
It kills me when outlets like CTV fall for this nonsense and just faithfully regurgitate the talking points in this Fraser Institute study.
Peter Beinart: "And what do you think would happen if Hamas released the Hostages?" I could answer that. The living hostages would be reunited with their families, the murdered hostages could receive a proper burial, Hamas could surrender, the war would end & Gaza could rebuild.
Universal Basic Income is not inevitable, no matter how many times socialists say so.
Bret Stephens is a treasured voice of moral clarity, desperately needed in a world flooded with anti-Israel exaggerations, distortions, and outright lies. nytimes.com/2025/07/22/opi…
Yes, there are still people doing this performative nonsense. Prior to Covid the science of how airborne diseases spreaders was no different and yet this person lived decades of her life not wearing a mask. But the TV told her it was moral and good and so now here we are.
There are six uncomfortable truths in this article about the reasons for Canada's measles outbreak 🧵 Uncomfortable Truth #1: Federal government mishandling of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout eroded some public trust in vaccination guidance, thereby deepening vaccine hesitancy.
x.com/i/article/1944…
Capitalism harnesses the good in humanity and gives ways for individuals to conquer the bad. Socialism attempts to harness the good but does so inefficiently at first and often totally fails later on. All the while it becomes harder and harder for people to get around the bad.
UBI is immoral and bad economics. Stop gaslighting.
It's true.