CHIKAMARA
@Afri_Kamara
I be IGBO. I be BIAFRAN. I be PAN AFRICAN. I be ODINAALA SPIRITUALLY. No Noise, Just Nation Building. BIAFRA ☀️ 🌄 NA BIA.
Now that the Zik whitewashing attempt failed woefully this morning, you’ve swiftly cooked up another narrative, emotional propaganda to divert attention. You lost the narrative battle today. Take it with dignity, reflect, and stop projecting.
The bigotry conversation on IGBO TikTok and Twitter didn’t start today, and it certainly didn’t start with IPOB. It was Obidients, not IPOB, who mainstreamed identity attacks, character assassination, and online witch-hunts as a way to get back at their ronu rivals. Most of the…
because he sought to free his people from colonial influence, giving them the opportunity to determine their own affiliations and future. Biafra’s freedom would advance true Pan-Africanism, not distort it. Written by -MNK Jr. 25/7/2025. @marcus_herve @Ifyyodunze @AIT_Online
Instead, Nigeria is a forced union, orchestrated by a British colonialist, Frederick Lugard, combining peoples with distinct value systems, cultures, histories, and displaced indigenous populations through distorted territories. Ojukwu was more of a Pan-Africanist than Zik
Has Nigeria achieved the economic sovereignty that Biafra, which Zik helped crush, attained in that short period? Nigeria was created through colonial border-drawing and gerrymandering. It lacks a history of people willingly uniting.
British monarchy’s influence through the Commonwealth and political dependency? Since Zik’s vision of “One Nigeria” was realized, what tangible benefits have emerged? Has Nigeria refined its own oil and gas, as Biafra did during its three years of independence in the 1960s?
There must be a defined, mutual willingness to recognize and unite as a people, with a shared consensus on our goals. No nation can stand on multiculturalism, as it violates the universal definition of a nation. How can Pan-Africanism be achieved when Nigeria remains under the
❤️🖤💚
Does Nigeria have a common history? No. Does Nigeria have a common indigenous language or culture? No. What, then, makes Nigeria a nation? Before African unity can be achieved, there must be a clear understanding of our cultural, social, and traditional differences.
constitutes a nation. A nation is defined as a group of people united by common descent, value systems, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a specific territory. Does Nigeria have a common descent? No. Does Nigeria have a shared value system? No.
Why is Kwame Nkrumah not celebrated by the West as a Pan-Africanist? Why are Patrice Lumumba and Marcus Garvey not in their favor? Why are true Pan-Africanists consistently at odds with the West? Zik’s push for a unified Nigeria reveals his misunderstanding of what
not a Western-influenced version of Pan-Africanism. It is critical to distinguish between a Western, whitewashed version of Pan-Africanism and true Pan-Africanism. Zik represents the former, which explains why he remains favored by the West.
remain under the influence of the Commonwealth? True Pan-Africanism requires sovereign nations—constitutionally, culturally, ethically, politically, and economically free—that willingly unite to achieve an independently agreed-upon unification of African peoples,
The question arises: Who created Nigeria? Was it the Hausa, Yoruba, Kanuri, Efik, Ijaw, or Igbo? Was Nigeria not created by the British? Who controlled Nigeria then, and who controls it today? If Zik was a true Pan-Africanist, why does Nigeria
Let us pause to clarify the true meaning of Pan-Africanism in a philosophical sense: the global unification of indigenous Africans, led by Africans, through shared cultural norms and social customs to achieve liberation from Western influence.
which the British supported. If Zik was a true Pan-Africanist, why did he fight to preserve Nigeria, a colonial construct of the British? Does protecting Nigeria’s unity equate to Pan-Africanism? If so, this suggests a neocolonial redefinition of Pan-Africanism.
struggle for self-determination contradicts Pan-Africanism. If not countered, it risks becoming a falsehood disguised as truth. Zik’s betrayal of the Biafran cause had nothing to do with Pan-Africanism; rather, it stemmed from his power-hungry political ambitions,
Debunking the Myth: Zik’s Betrayal of Biafra and the True Meaning of Pan-Africanism The notion that Zik’s Pan-Africanism led him to betray his own people is laughable. History remains clear and cannot be distorted. This perverse notion indirectly builds a lie that Biafra’s
You dy mind them, what they are trying to say in essence is that Harry, Marquis, Uche NWA mkpi and the rest of them are IPOB... Since they say, na IPOB start bigotry. We were on this app when they said they no longer do bigotry, they now do trigotry. Was it IPOB that coined that…
x.com/emekagift100/s…
It was great, our people are happy and very appropriative of IPOB agricultural revolution..We are glad for your farm produce. As I said before, you haven't seen anything yet. Our people really invested heavily in Agriculture following IPOB call that we must return to farm and…